31–40 of 786 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> in countries where IP address = person that rents it. Does that actually exist today? At least IPv4 addresses I would expect to increasingly mean nothing, as address exhaustion drives more people behind CGNAT.
The US has very little CGNAT outside of mobile networks and small rural ISPs
Laughs in Usenet. The proliferation of streaming services and restricted content has me investing in alternative options more these days. It's not about paying for content, it's about content becoming less accessible again.
My ISP actually prohibits P2P transfers, so whatever you're downloading, if you want to use torrents, it's the only way to go without getting nasty emails.
I'm on a personal 4G sim wifi router currently and the results are completely wrong.
Funny to see how many movies are torrented on a mobile 4g network. What a waste of bandwidth.
Laughs in Usenet. The proliferation of streaming services and restricted content has me investing in alternative options more these days. It's not about paying for content, it's about content becoming less accessible again.
Alternately, a seedbox or seebox-like service like Put.io. My ISP actually prohibits P2P transfers, so whatever you're downloading, if you want to use torrents, it's the only way to go without getting nasty emails.
Apparently Blindspot, Warrior, Hanna and the Twilight zone is pretty popular for my ip address. I've never downloaded any of these and Twilight zone is the only one i've even heard of. I also can't torrent things through my service provider, they throttle them, so i've never actually used a torrent program at all from this IP. So, that I guess...
Has your IP address changed recently? I definitely didn't want to post this under the implication that it is always 100% accurate.
How does BitTorrent handle Carrier level NATs with IPv4?