Live data from Hacker News

Text-Only Social Network

subreply.com

91–100 of 240 posts

Re: Text-Only Social Network

#91

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't think it was a technical decision. It sounds like a stylistic choice, I suspect in the sentiment of "everyone on the platform should be able to understand each other, no one should be locked off from interesting conversations due to a language barrier", and from there they selected the lowest common denominator language. To play devil's advocate, I don't think your exampled limitations are meaningful handicap…

MacBooks sold in the UK have a £ sign on them, where a # is found on a US keyboard. So in the country the English language originated in, you're not allowed to use a character on the default keyboard. (And that's just one -- the € is on there too, among others.) We're not talking obscure key combos, we're talking characters in use everywhere you go every day. Would you really appreciate not being able to use the $ ch…

[deleted]

Re: Text-Only Social Network

#92

When you say "social network", do you mean Twitter Clone? It seems like developers in particular have come to regard Twitter as archetypal social networks despite it's many problems and the way the user doesn't really much ability to define their own social graph. IE, N-character limit is still a determiner of Twitter (poisonous) discourse quality, just for example and Twitter isn't something most people enjoy being…

The character limit is the last of Twitters issue, in my opinion. I think the #1 issue is the retweet model, it leads to people just brainlessly sharing low effort content with a single click. It's similar to how fake news and misleading content thrive on Facebook. But notice how Instagram where it's impossible to easily re-share content (well, you can now in stories) is far less toxic.

Re: Text-Only Social Network

#93
post #76

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Stay tuned for my uppercase-only social network. Also, we don’t allow the letter Z nor semicolons, as they are rarely used.

Wanna try making that the letter E? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gadsby_(novel)

Yes, that always astonished me. This novel is famous, but I’ve never met anyone who’s actually read it.

Re: Text-Only Social Network

#97

When you say "social network", do you mean Twitter Clone? It seems like developers in particular have come to regard Twitter as archetypal social networks despite it's many problems and the way the user doesn't really much ability to define their own social graph. IE, N-character limit is still a determiner of Twitter (poisonous) discourse quality, just for example and Twitter isn't something most people enjoy being…

The character limit is the last of Twitters issue, in my opinion. I think the #1 issue is the retweet model, it leads to people just brainlessly sharing low effort content with a single click. It's similar to how fake news and misleading content thrive on Facebook. But notice how Instagram where it's impossible to easily re-share content (well, you can now in stories) is far less toxic.

An honest UI might use the word “echo” rather than “retweet”.

Re: Text-Only Social Network

#98

When you say "social network", do you mean Twitter Clone? It seems like developers in particular have come to regard Twitter as archetypal social networks despite it's many problems and the way the user doesn't really much ability to define their own social graph. IE, N-character limit is still a determiner of Twitter (poisonous) discourse quality, just for example and Twitter isn't something most people enjoy being…

> N-character limit is still a determiner of Twitter (poisonous) discourse quality

Is this an assumption or is there evidence?

I can see why at first glance that would seem true, but I also see conspiracy theories spread with or without character limits. What seems to do better for discourse is not char limits, but rather enforcing limits on misinformation and hate speech.

Re: Text-Only Social Network

#99

Earlier quoted context omitted.

From the about section (emphasis added): >Subreply was created by Lucian Marin from the desire of a having a simple to use, English only , public forum that has nothing in common with ancient and untrustworthy social networks. [...] >Limitations >480 characters per reply ASCII only because it works everywhere I could see this being a xenophobic thing, but I could also see it being more about the limited character set…

Where does Unicode not work? It’s been everywhere for years

He even has emojis for the "avatar"...

Re: Text-Only Social Network

#100
post #62

I wanted to see how it would handle non-ascii text so I typed 안녕하세요 and it romanized it to annyeonghaseyo. (This is "hello" in Korean). I did not expect that. I really like the idea of a text-only social network, so I hope this takes off. I think the author should consider supporting other languages though. Seeing romanized text isn't very helpful to people that actually want to read or write in other character sets.…

Does the same thing with Russian as well. (I wonder how it would tell the difference between Russian, Ukrainian and Bulgarian though?)

There are other romanisations of Korean besides, although this is the government official one.

For maximum confusion there are also cyrillizations, how would it go with that:)

Post reply on HN