Earlier quoted context omitted.
I mean it's limited to content managed by the browser, whereas the native WM way works for all apps.
I guess I don't know enough about how WMs work. :( I'm curious how the WM could detect that the a portion of a window is playing video, and break that out into it's own movable window? I'm not sure how you do that without the browser managing that.
Firefox Picture-in-Picture
51–60 of 160 posts
Re: Firefox Picture-in-Picture
#52Earlier quoted context omitted.
I mean it's limited to content managed by the browser, whereas the native WM way works for all apps.
Right. It should send the stream to the system video player. If you then want no window decorations or whatever you go to the video player app developers.
Re: Firefox Picture-in-Picture
#53Earlier quoted context omitted.
The PIP video is independent of the browser window that contained the video -- it can be moved around the desktop and resized with no window decorations and also stays on top of all other windows in the desktop env.
If you don’t like window decorations (and I don’t blame you) just run a wm with no window decorations (like cwm.)
Re: Firefox Picture-in-Picture
#54I've been using this a lot lately for YouTube videos so I can watch a video and keep web surfing. Works great, though the PiP doesn't have all the controls (e.g. volume and seek).
Re: Firefox Picture-in-Picture
#55I've been using this a lot lately for YouTube videos so I can watch a video and keep web surfing. Works great, though the PiP doesn't have all the controls (e.g. volume and seek).
Re: Firefox Picture-in-Picture
#56PiP is such a great feature. I have no idea how easy/hard it was to implement but it feels nice to use. It does exactly what you'd expect it to do and nothing more. I use it while watching overwatch league games in the browser because it allows me to resize the popped-out video arbitrarily, instead of the site's embedded youtube player options of either tiny-window-in-browser or full-screen sizes (there is no theater…
It is a little clunky and could use a good deal of polish. For example, you can only PiP one video, and controls remain in the tab with the video frame. PiP only gives you play/pause, no scrubbing or anything from the embedded player. The always on top is a feature for some, but can be a hindrance, too. That behavior should be a toggle for the user so they can use their tools how they like.
Re: Firefox Picture-in-Picture
#57Earlier quoted context omitted.
I mean it's limited to content managed by the browser, whereas the native WM way works for all apps.
I guess I don't know enough about how WMs work. :( I'm curious how the WM could detect that the a portion of a window is playing video, and break that out into it's own movable window? I'm not sure how you do that without the browser managing that.
Re: Firefox Picture-in-Picture
#58Re: Firefox Picture-in-Picture
#59Re: Firefox Picture-in-Picture
#60Opera has had this feature for years and features more playback controls than FF. It seems many features start on Opera then get "invented" in other browsers afterwards.