Instructors want to reduce their risk of exposure, which is understandable. But serving that interest also means a lot of international students will lose their visas. Would limiting seats in class to just international students be a good way to reconcile both parties' interests? Edit: this would raise issues of fairness and equal treatment (a lot of students, especially those not accustomed to remote learning, would…
Students will lose their visas because of bureaucratic BS which can be changed anytime, but probably won't be because of the current political climate.
So, one concern is grounded in nature, another in bureaucracy, I don't think there is much of reconciliation. Although I agree completely that students are not getting what they paid for (if they paid for in-person classes).