Live data from Hacker News

EasyOCR: Ready-to-use OCR with 40 languages

github.com

1–10 of 73 posts

Re: EasyOCR: Ready-to-use OCR with 40 languages

#5
post #4
post #2

What would be the advantage compared to something like Tesseract ?

Tesseract isn't very accurate, especially with text in photos. It works OK for scanned documents, but that's about it.

I didn't see any accuracy comparison in the EasyOCR repo.

Re: EasyOCR: Ready-to-use OCR with 40 languages

#6
post #4
post #2

What would be the advantage compared to something like Tesseract ?

Tesseract isn't very accurate, especially with text in photos. It works OK for scanned documents, but that's about it.

This depends on the model you use, right? As far as I know, Tesseract supports a couple of models, and you could also use a more powerful neural network in there. And if you have trained it well, it should be fine.

Re: EasyOCR: Ready-to-use OCR with 40 languages

#9
post #4

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Tesseract isn't very accurate, especially with text in photos. It works OK for scanned documents, but that's about it.

This depends on the model you use, right? As far as I know, Tesseract supports a couple of models, and you could also use a more powerful neural network in there. And if you have trained it well, it should be fine.

AFAIK Tesseract is trained to recognize characters and uses a bunch of steps to prepare image for recognition. Steps like removing noise, fixing contrast and resizing.

It means that it performs not-so-good when for example image contains black text and white text on green background since this is not "normalized" through image preparation steps and it cannot detect white text on green background (but you can do it yourself)

Post reply on HN