Earlier quoted context omitted.
Because the goal wasn’t to help the people most affected. It was to maintain the socioeconomic order so that people would be incentivized to continue doing menial work for low wages. If you give people at the bottom a choice to not work, by giving them cash directly, then they would have better negotiating power versus employers. The employers would then have to raise wages, and therefore prices. That means consumers…
I don’t think you can make this argument when at the same time the government was paying an extra $600 per week on top of regular pay for unemployment.
Searchable PPP Loan Data
221–230 of 354 posts
Re: Searchable PPP Loan Data
#222Earlier quoted context omitted.
Totally agree, and I think this is important to emphasize. I was involved in researching the requirements for a PPP loan for a nonprofit. I can guarantee that the vast majority of businesses (like 95%+) took out these loans with the intention they would never be paid back. Indeed, that was a feature, not a bug, of the whole "loan" program. If you took out the loans to keep employees on staff (and did so), then you ha…
>So it kind of irks me to see some people frame this like a large percentage of these loans will be paid back. I constantly see this..."its not free money, its a loan, and the money will be paid back with interest, just like in 2008." No, its free money for businesses, many of which will fail and let their employees go anyway. Then you hear people claim how somehow it was a victory to keep people off unemployment for…
If it goes to salaries, those salaries are taxed (both payroll taxes for the employer and income taxes for the employee).
Those salaries, for the most part, get spent - on things with sales tax, creating business profits that are taxed, and supporting the employment of employees' whose wages are also taxed.
The idea that it's one giant money suck for businesses with no immediate return to the economy is not really accurate - it's not a zero-sum game.
Re: Searchable PPP Loan Data
#223Earlier quoted context omitted.
You don't get forgiveness for wages you don't pay.
Is there any penalty for increasing wages after receiving the "loan" ?
Let’s not be so quick to label everything fraud, or greed. Sure some people will misuse funds. But most wont. Most people are good.
Re: Searchable PPP Loan Data
#224Earlier quoted context omitted.
I am not necessarily disagreeing with you but a lot of small businesses in the US survive on thin margins and the owners also don't make a lot of money necessarily. So it is not always the case that a company only has to worry about income. They have to worry about paying employees, ensuring they can meet payroll (which in turn helps families of those workers), keep liabilities in check and many other issues. I am to…
The outrage is that the money didn't go to small businesses, but rather large ones who had the means to cheat the system.
Re: Searchable PPP Loan Data
#225Not a good look for the Ayn Rand Institute lol
Re: Searchable PPP Loan Data
#226My kids' private school recently sent out a $500 per student tuition credit (about $650K for the entire school). I see now that they got a multi million dollar PPP loan (which will be forgiven). Their revenues were unaffected by the epidemic (full enrollment for next year and no plans to rollback the tuition increase).
- more costs for financial aid
- more costs for cleaning and retrofitting facilities
- more costs for experts on reopening safely
- more costs for online education programs (software, training, etc)
- refunds of after-school programs, field trips, etc.
- fewer donations from alumni
The only thing that's really improved is maybe utilities? They 100% would have laid off teachers if they didn't get the PPP. It's ludicrous that people are begrudging schools for using this program exactly as intended.
Re: Searchable PPP Loan Data
#227Without this program, my employer would have had to either lay off a large group of employees or we would've gone under. As it is, out of a group of about 50, we furloughed 8, who continued without pay, qualified for unemployment benefits, but retained 100% health coverage. Two have returned to work already and we anticipate being more or less normal again in time to meet the loan forgiveness criteria. It's good to h…
So will your employer be paying the "loan" back?
Re: Searchable PPP Loan Data
#228There are several scenarios that frustrate me. Examples like law firms or physicians' offices. These are relatively small firms with very wealthy principals. They are asking for taxpayer money to maintain their wealthy lifestyles, so they don't have to sacrifice their Bentleys to pay staffers. Examples: Thomas J Henry in San Antonio. LLCs and franchisees that probably have millions of dollars in holdings and cash, bu…
Re: Searchable PPP Loan Data
#229Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Should they not have taken it? I seriously considered not cashing my stimulus check until I talked to multiple well off people that cashed their dead relative's checks. There just isnt a cultural expectation in the US that you wouldn't take what you're given. EDIT: Rethinking my comment I'm giving myself too much credit. Since I never got a physical check, I couldn't have "not cashed it" if I wanted to.
To your point, I know a bunch of people who applied for the forgivable loans just to see if they could get it. I know a guy who owns over two hundred Domino's franchises and got a $6M forgivable loan and his business has been up 30% since covid started. He can't hire people fast enough. Another friend was pissed that he wasn't approved for a loan too even though he has zero employees.
Re: Searchable PPP Loan Data
#230Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Religious organizations. It's one thing if something like a local YMCA gets funds, but a church outright getting funds without proving it is going to public services (why don't we just have better public services?) is not proper. Churches already don't pay taxes. They still have to pay their employees, which is the point of the PPP. Those employees are paid from the funds that come in via donations, which are likel…
> The requirements of the PPP require that at least 60% must go to salaries. My understanding was that 60% of what you don't have to pay back goes to salary. The money that went to salaries and an additional 67% you just keep. Is that right?