Live data from Hacker News

Did a Chinese Hack Kill Nortel?

bloomberg.com

61–70 of 137 posts

Re: Did a Chinese Hack Kill Nortel?

#61
post #39

The telecommunications industry goes from a massive bubble in year 2000 to an extreme cost focus just one or two years later. Sending tens of thousands of engineers into unemployment and cutting research and development to the bone. Talk to anyone who had a job in the sector back then, they will you this. All those engineers eventualy were reemployed in other industries such as software and that helped creating the b…

> willing to invest unlike us in the west

The article says Huawei was given $10 billion or more in free or almost free loans.

Re: Did a Chinese Hack Kill Nortel?

#62

Earlier quoted context omitted.

getting downvoted for pointing out facts and reiterating the authors own words. The anti-Chinese hysteria on this website really is a sight to behold at this point. Is "China bad" how HN and the US is going to look for the next 20 years as North America goes down the hill? For an actual science based look at Nortel there was a good study done by a team at the Tefler School of Business years ago.[1] Taking an extensiv…

As someone who is neither Chinese nor American and has no horse in this race, I find it amusing how strong the bias against China is on this site. TikTok accesses clipboard, it must be an intelligence operation; LinkedIn and AirBnB do the same, I guess the devs were lazy and didn't do enough testing. Someone find a security hole in a Huawei device, that must be a communist backdoor; a Cisco device has the same securi…

> we judge ourselves by our intentions

People also judge others by past behaviors.

Wrong or right, many Americans see China as an enemy. News is filtered through that light. And some news, like convictions about IP theft by Chinese (Xu at IBM, 3 individuals at Sinovel, etc, etc, etc), leave little room for debate. These stories color the ones which may or may not be nefarious like TikTok. Guilt by association.

Re: Did a Chinese Hack Kill Nortel?

#63
post #17

There's a lot here beyond just the hacking. Huawei was able to grow so insanely fast because they had access to a blank check and endless credit from the Chinese government. Nortel and others meanwhile had to finance things themselves. Private companies cannot compete with governments. Governments, especially those with sovereign currencies, can do things that private companies simply cannot do and have pockets far d…

Kelley Johnson’s Skunk Works was successful because it rejected government controls and oversight. Read Kelley’s 14 rules of Management.

Johnson had a 15th rule that he passed on by word of mouth. According to the book "Skunk Works" the 15th rule is: "Starve before doing business with the damned Navy.“ because the Navy wouldn’t relinquish control of projects to the Skunkworks.

And it’s “funding” was paid contracts for performance, not an infinite credit line of free cash that Huawei got. Entirely different things. Huawei has sucked up a huge amount of Chinese resources, and there is no guarantee they’ve made a positive return, or ever will.

And SpaceX is a great example, just like the Skunkworks it’s NASA funding was pay for performance. SpaceX would have been out if business without the first contract, and would not be remotely as big today without the others, but those contracts have also saved NASA billions of dollars.

The vast majority of government funded projects are similar to the SLS, which has eaten up $15B+ in taxpayer funds without a launch. And when it finally launches 4+ years late it will be the most expensive launch system ever by a factor of over 2x per launch, and at least 20 times more expensive per pound than commercial launch systems. While reusing 40 year old engines!

Re: Did a Chinese Hack Kill Nortel?

#64
post #28
post #5

My parents lost a small fortune in 2001 riding the tech crash down (Nortel was a good chunk of that). I've been trying to explain to them (1st gen Chinese immigrants) for the past three years that Nortel was killed partly by focused Chinese spying and IP-theft by Huawei. CSIS has know about this for years. They (my parents) just wouldn't believe it until I showed them this article. Their former university classmates…

I find it hard to believe that the company was so incredibly fragile that it, uniquely among its competitors was killed by Huawei stealing some of its IP. Far more likely, there's no shortage of other reasons that led to its downfall, but it's easier for the people responsible to blame spies.

Too big to fail is a complete myth. It's more likely the other way round.

Re: Did a Chinese Hack Kill Nortel?

#65
post #17

There's a lot here beyond just the hacking. Huawei was able to grow so insanely fast because they had access to a blank check and endless credit from the Chinese government. Nortel and others meanwhile had to finance things themselves. Private companies cannot compete with governments. Governments, especially those with sovereign currencies, can do things that private companies simply cannot do and have pockets far d…

This is why Boeing should be bailed out (but with prison time and fines that impoverish for anyone involved in the cover up)

Boeing should be forced into Chapter 11 so new ownership with clean hands can fix them. That’s the whole reason we have a bankruptcy code.

Re: Did a Chinese Hack Kill Nortel?

#67

The hacks were not the problem. They engaged in financial shenanigans because they had a bankrupt management culture. Their decline and fall were the direct result of their human problems. And, briefly, their human problems stemmed from their human problems. Culture and management matter.

I've worked in a similar communications behemoth that was very closely related to the company in question. I have first hand experience with toxic, entitled, self-dealing management culture, poor-me devs, steady stream of clueless interns, oblivious contractors.. Vapid VP's, diddling directors, the works! Definitely suspected there were spies of all colors amongst us, but hey! the coffee was great.

Re: Did a Chinese Hack Kill Nortel?

#68
It's capitalism that killed it. Stock price was sky high because of the optical-fiber hype. Management has to kill those traditional businesses (switches, etc) that doesn't have that high growth rate that justifies the stock price. Then optical hype was busted..

Also, who was supporting telecom in the old days? Bell Labs, AT&T, Lucent, etc? The government of course. Privatization happened and trade agreements with Europe meant the US and Canadian government can no longer support telcos and thus the downfall of all these companies at the time.. Even European ones like Alcatel, Nokia, Ericsson, Siemens. This allowed the Asian telcos, not only the Chinese ones, but Korean ones like Samsung to take over.. (Of course the Chinese government and Korean governments were and are still heavily involved in them).

Re: Did a Chinese Hack Kill Nortel?

#69
This is the decade old Brian Shields, ex-Nortel security adviser, story that got resuscitated against Huawei for the 5G war. No one took it seriously at the time because it doesn't comport with reality.

Nortel primarily died from poorly conceived massive spending that fucked them during the dotcom/telecom bubble crash, executives started cooking the books, it was discovered, the company imploded. Don't get me wrong, Nortel was definitely the victim of industrial espionage, every telecom vendor in the world was being infiltrated by China at the time, CISCO, Siemens, Nokia, SonyEriccson, Acatel&Lucent etc. But they managed to survive or consolidate after the crash. Companies like Nortel don't implode that hard and fast from espionage - massive corporate incompetence and malfeasance however, will.

BTW Huawei itself didn't hack Nortel, the original reporting blamed Chinese state actors who then passed what they found onto other domestic players like Huawei and ZTE which was actually CPC's original domestic champion before US sanctions crippled them, after which Huawei took the crown. This point is salient, Huawei literally out competed the favourite child. Regardless, if memory serve the tech Huawei used from Nortel was related to optical routing which was a niche segment that wasn't a large part of Nortel's portfolio. So even if Huawei, who was a small player at the time, stole Nortel's tech and took the relevant market shares, it would not have killed or even crippled Nortel. There are entire books and lectures dissecting Nortel's demise, the role of Huawei is never seen as anything but tangential, and playing it up is basically revisionist history / propaganda.

Somewhat related, expat anecdotes of Nortel China in the late 90s - it was a shit place to work. Nortel Guangzhou drove away many of their talent (at least in engineering) because they wouldn't promote PRC nationals, and even Chinese Canadians. A lot of them ended up being poached by rivals or moved over to state enterprises, some with usb sticks full of data because Nortel fucked them. I knew a bunch of engineers with jumped shit with hard drives to Siemens and Lucent who later ended up at ZTE.

Edit: Also for anyone wondering why Bloomberg's reporting on China has shifted in the last few years even before the trade war (prior Bloomberg was a pretty ardent globalist, i.e. pro Chinese engagement like most of big business), this article from 4 years ago speculating Bloomberg was too pro-China and needed to cultivate anti-China bonafides if he wanted to run as president. Prescient.

Michael Bloomberg Has An Achilles Heel And It Is Not Guns Or Age But China https://www.forbes.com/sites/eamonnfingleton/2016/01/24/mich...

Re: Did a Chinese Hack Kill Nortel?

#70

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Bloomberg's last China hack article was completely discredited, and still no retraction/explaination. They have the appearances of Trump's propaganda machine. Considering the timing of this relative to the election and GOP's sole strategy of China scapegoating we can all take this latest as more of the same

In case you're not a troll and your vision was just clouded by mindless Trump and GOP hate: Have you ever heard the name Michael 'Mike' Bloomberg[1] before? He was a registered Democrat candidate running against(!) Trump in the presidential race. The same Mike Bloomberg is also the founder and owner (well, majority shareholder) of Bloomberg L.P.[2]. Why would a Democrat presidential candidate use his company's influe…

It's possible for two people of different political parties to agree on something. Bloomberg's brief candidacy was characterized by being to the right of the entire rest of the Democratic field.
Post reply on HN