Scott Adam's Controversial Deleted Post on Men's Rights
tinysprout.tumblr.com
Scott Adam's Controversial Deleted Post on Men's Rights
1–10 of 39 posts
Re: Scott Adam's Controversial Deleted Post on Men's Rights
#2Should edit the title; apostrophe goes after the s.
"Scott Adams' Controversial..."
Re: Scott Adam's Controversial Deleted Post on Men's Rights
#3Scott Adams chose to delete his post. For the blogger to repost it, IMHO, shows a lack of respect.
Re: Scott Adam's Controversial Deleted Post on Men's Rights
#4Sometimes we take a line of argument and simply write on and see where it goes. Scott has obviously decided to trash it. Why would anyone choose to retrieve it?
Re: Scott Adam's Controversial Deleted Post on Men's Rights
#5Scott Adams chose to delete his post. For the blogger to repost it, IMHO, shows a lack of respect.
I'd say showing a lack of respect was intended judging by the blogger's comment at the end.
Re: Scott Adam's Controversial Deleted Post on Men's Rights
#6[deleted]
Re: Scott Adam's Controversial Deleted Post on Men's Rights
#7Scott Adams chose to delete his post. For the blogger to repost it, IMHO, shows a lack of respect.
Does the Wayback Machine show a lack of respect?
Re: Scott Adam's Controversial Deleted Post on Men's Rights
#8Scott Adams chose to delete his post. For the blogger to repost it, IMHO, shows a lack of respect.
Bullshit. If you write something and publish it to the world, you can't just take it back. You can edit it, publish corrections, or clarify your position, but you can't un-publish something unless you get lucky and no one noticed before you deleted it.
Adams has been on the internet long enough to know better. And honestly, he's made a habit of putting his foot in his mouth in the past few years. It was just a matter of time before he said something really stupid, like this.
Honestly, what shocks me the most is that he doesn't have some sort of editorial review process. The man undoubtedly has a publicist of some sort... for someone that well known to have no one between him and the publish button is completely insane.
Re: Scott Adam's Controversial Deleted Post on Men's Rights
#9Scott Adams chose to delete his post. For the blogger to repost it, IMHO, shows a lack of respect.
Utterly 100% disagree. Scott Adams posted it, and part of publishing anything comes with the responsibility and acknowledgement that it is subject to judgement.
If it had been snapshotted by the Wayback machine, who is being disrespectful?
Re: Scott Adam's Controversial Deleted Post on Men's Rights
#10Scott Adams chose to delete his post. For the blogger to repost it, IMHO, shows a lack of respect.
Bullshit. If you write something and publish it to the world, you can't just take it back. You can edit it, publish corrections, or clarify your position, but you can't un-publish something unless you get lucky and no one noticed before you deleted it. Adams has been on the internet long enough to know better. And honestly, he's made a habit of putting his foot in his mouth in the past few years. It was just a matter…
Arguably reproducing his entire blog post verbatim violates his copyright...