Earlier quoted context omitted.
No women were involved?
You're just trying to hop on the train, ain't you?
How hard would it be to write "men and women" (or "women and men").
What do you reckon? The fellas who "did all the work" in US history, you reckon they did all their own cooking and cleaning, you reckon their intimate partners, or close-others didn't contribute any to the people whom history attributes greatness?
Probably not old boy, fair chance the wives, partners, and mistresses went a long way to getting us where we are.
And that's if they weren't directly responsible but not attributed. How's that saying go, next to every great man is an even greater women. It's often true, except that the woman part could be generalised to partner or carer.
Some people act alone, outliers though.
And to still, in this socio-political climate, not to bother to include women is, at least, tone deaf, if not outright intentionally exclusive.