Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Recommend a maths book for a teenager?

news.ycombinator.com

51–60 of 194 posts

Re: Ask HN: Recommend a maths book for a teenager?

#52
I worked through a lot of this partial differential equations book during downtime while working in a gas station after my freshman year of college:

https://www.amazon.com/Differential-Equations-Scientists-Eng...

Might be a little advanced for most teenagers (I was 19 that summer), but I love the book and still refer to it from time to time. I did have experience with ordinary differential equations at the time, but I haven't found an ODE book that's quite the same.

Re: Ask HN: Recommend a maths book for a teenager?

#54
If you want to get away from analysis, I've found that cryptography can be quite an engaging subject. If you have the right book, it can have the rigors of more mathematical subjects, while being accessible without extensive background and having visible real-world applications. I unfortunately don't have much experience with books in this area, but I do like https://files.boazbarak.org/crypto/lnotes_book.pdf (plus it's free ;) ).

[EDIT: Previously I recommended Calculus on Manifolds here also, but on further reflection and reading some of the other responses I think I both misremembered the difficulty level of the book and overestimated what early-undergrad level means]

Re: Ask HN: Recommend a maths book for a teenager?

#55

The Road to Reality by Roger Penrose. https://www.nytimes.com/2005/02/27/books/review/the-road-to-...

This book is totally inappropriate for learning mathematics, especially for a teenager. A well-prepared layman, maybe, but not a teenager who just wants a good introduction to the subject.

Re: Ask HN: Recommend a maths book for a teenager?

#56
God Created the Integers: The Mathematical Breakthroughs That Changed History. Stephen Hawking. I bought mine for cheap on alibris (https://www.alibris.com/God-Created-the-Integers-The-Mathema...)

From the blurb:

"...includes landmark discoveries spanning 2500 years and representing the work of mathematicians such as Euclid, Georg Cantor, Kurt Godel, Augustin Cauchy, Bernard Riemann and Alan Turing. Each chapter begins with a biography of the featured mathematician, clearly explaining the significance of the result, followed by the full proof of the work, reproduced from the original publication, many in new translations."

What's great about this book for a teenager is that they get to read original sources for the stuff they've already learned! And indeed, as they learn more they can keep coming back for more original sources. Personally, reading Descartes original words in Geometry was awe-inspiring, not because every word was so perfect, but because he comes across as just so damn human, the ideas he presents are subtle and profound, and yet presented with an interesting combination of humility and pride that is instantly recognizable. I truly wish I'd had something like that book before embarking on my own journey through math - we stand on the shoulders of giants, but we so rarely look down to see their faces.

Re: Ask HN: Recommend a maths book for a teenager?

#58
In response to the question about the best book to learn [subject] from, the best answer I ever received was: "the third book".

The point being, of course, that it may take a few different expositions before something 'clicks'. I think this observation is particularly important for self study.

So, in answer to your question: maybe more than one book?

Re: Ask HN: Recommend a maths book for a teenager?

#59
post #19

Visual Complex Analysis. Partly because it's a brilliant book and partly because Complex Analysis is often really really badly taught. If you haven't read it, it teaches complex analysis in terms of transformations and pictures rather than solely algebra. It's very clever; Also touches on some concepts in physics and vector calculus. If you like the style 3Blue1Brown uses, he cites VCA as an inspiration for that styl…

A more traditional complex analysis textbook that's really good is Stewart and Tall's Complex Analysis. It's not necessarily a great complement to VCA; I used them both in my course and didn't find myself referring to VCA much, but then I had good lectures in my course and really got on with Stewart and Tall.

The "standard" book was Churchill and Brown and, uh, I'd say that one is best avoided. It's awful enough that it may be responsible for a number of those courses being so badly taught....

Post reply on HN