Live data from Hacker News

Botswana: Lab tests to solve mystery of hundreds of dead elephants

bbc.com

41–50 of 80 posts

Re: Botswana: Lab tests to solve mystery of hundreds of dead elephants

#41

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The environment has not changed much at all in the past two decades. You spuriously quote a few random cases of sudden death and claim it has been on the uptick but lack the holistic data of the past few hundred years to determine whether that's a true statement or not. The beached whale could be caused by shifts in Earth's geomagnetic field, which whales use to navigate: https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/weakening-earths-ma…

Holistic data across the entire animal kingdom is difficult to come by, but everywhere we look we're finding hints that there are serious issues. On just insects: > A reanalysis published in 2017 suggested that, in 1989–2016, there had been a "seasonal decline of 76%, and mid-summer decline of 82%, in flying insect biomass over the 27 years of study". The decline was "apparent regardless of habitat type" and could no…

The rate of insect decline on land is less than the rate of growth in/on bodies of water.

https://science.sciencemag.org/content/368/6489/417.full?ijk...

Re: Botswana: Lab tests to solve mystery of hundreds of dead elephants

#42
post #33
post #20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"green energy" if you're insinuating that wind power kills birds, that's something you can totally stop worrying about. A single turbine kills as many birds as a cat per year.

I’m talking about the aggregate number. Buildings, cats, ... Our total footprint. I’m not sure of the exact wind turbine impact. It’s a rapidly growing form of energy. But that really is my point, people brush aside all the small impacts and we damage the environment in many small ways that really add up As for birds, the Audubon has some information. “ Wind turbines kill an estimated 140,000 to 328,000 birds each ye…

The American Bird Conservancy estimates that "In the United States alone, outdoor cats kill approximately 2.4 billion birds every year." [0]

Although it's true that everything we do as a species / society has an impact on the environment, I think it's still important to look at things like this with perspective. Unfortunately, even green/renewable energy sources have a negative impact on the environment; wind isn't the only one. Not sure I really disagree, though, just wanted to mention that the wind impact isn't really that (relatively) bad.

[0] https://abcbirds.org/program/cats-indoors/cats-and-birds/

Re: Botswana: Lab tests to solve mystery of hundreds of dead elephants

#43
post #27

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That post suffers from recentisim. Mass animal die off are not actually new. Unless you find data from at least 100 years ago to compare, you can not draw conclusions. > Compared to the time the grandfather post took to research, process, and write Yes, but the only data in the post is what is found online. So while that can be used to draw attention to an issue, you can not use it to describe a trend, or say that th…

Maybe you'll trust this 2015 article by National Geographic instead, backed by studies spanning the past 70+ years: https://www.nationalgeographic.com/news/2015/1/150113-mass-d... .

The study https://www.pnas.org/content/early/2015/01/08/1414894112

The scale is increasing for certain species but not all:

> We show that the magnitude of MMEs has been intensifying for birds, fishes, and marine invertebrates; invariant for mammals; and decreasing for reptiles and amphibians.

The causes are still largely unknown but there are some patterns:

> Regardless, the increase in MMEs appears to be associated with a rise in disease emergence, biotoxicity, and events produced by multiple interacting stressors, yet temporal trends in MME causes varied among taxa and may be associated with increased detectability.

Either way it's a worrying sign that environmental factors will always play a role. Even if it is mostly just widespread diseases we previously didn't have the capability to detect, or simply no one was looking (as the abstract mentions about detectability) - additional environmental stresses could amplify what was otherwise pretty normal.

In regards to the Elephants in Botswana this wouldn't yet meet their definition of MMEs (90% die off), or a good chunk of the other linked examples provided by OP. Additionally rates for mammals remain unchanged.

Re: Botswana: Lab tests to solve mystery of hundreds of dead elephants

#44
post #34
post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

We look for villains but the real problem is simply humans in general. We do so much damage to the world. Plastic, greenhouse gases, overfishing, etc. to support our way of life. Lots of other examples...We kill millions of birds with our pets, buildings, and green energy We need to find a way to reduce our impact on the planet.

Wait, you’re blaming humans when animals get diseases? I mean sure, we could have an impact, but animals are no different than humans, they get ravaged by epidemics. Think about human life before current medical care. A million different things trying to kill you. No different for an animal.

GP isn't blaming humans for animal diseases, but I am.

Human trade spreads pathogens/diseases at a tremendous rate compared to natural diffusion. There's quite a long list of diseases in non-humans spread through human trade.

Human activity might also make animals more susceptible to disease in general through a weakening of overall health through pollution and environmental disruption. This effect is hard to quantify but has the potential to be quite large.

Re: Botswana: Lab tests to solve mystery of hundreds of dead elephants

#45
post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

We look for villains but the real problem is simply humans in general. We do so much damage to the world. Plastic, greenhouse gases, overfishing, etc. to support our way of life. Lots of other examples...We kill millions of birds with our pets, buildings, and green energy We need to find a way to reduce our impact on the planet.

I downvoted you because they don't know what is killing these elephants. The problems you mention may have nothing to do with it.

“ No-one knows why the animals are dying in Botswana - home to a third of Africa's declining elephant population”

We are concerned about 300 because humans kill tens of thousands a year and we are driving them towards extinction.

If something goes wrong with the elephant population in Botswana, the acceleration will increase

Re: Botswana: Lab tests to solve mystery of hundreds of dead elephants

#46
I'll see if I can find the article but a couple of years ago there was another mass die off of a type of deer that has an enlarged nose. It appears the the average temperature had risen just enough to allow a common bacteria they had in the nasal passage to replicate at speed and poison them. It wasn't just the temperature, but the humidity (or lack of) that also led to this, I'll see if I can find the article.

https://phys.org/news/2015-05-mass-deaths-rare-kazakhstan-an... edit here was the detail. It appears it was the rain that caused the issue and a third of the total population died.

Re: Botswana: Lab tests to solve mystery of hundreds of dead elephants

#47
post #39
post #34

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Wait, you’re blaming humans when animals get diseases? I mean sure, we could have an impact, but animals are no different than humans, they get ravaged by epidemics. Think about human life before current medical care. A million different things trying to kill you. No different for an animal.

No, I didn’t blame humans for when animals get diseases. Humans kill an elephant every 15 minutes. That’s about 100 a day. At any rate, maybe you should look into our impact on the environment. Most people have no idea, so we continue to do the damage.

How many elephants die per day from natural causes?

Re: Botswana: Lab tests to solve mystery of hundreds of dead elephants

#48
post #44
post #34

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Wait, you’re blaming humans when animals get diseases? I mean sure, we could have an impact, but animals are no different than humans, they get ravaged by epidemics. Think about human life before current medical care. A million different things trying to kill you. No different for an animal.

GP isn't blaming humans for animal diseases, but I am. Human trade spreads pathogens/diseases at a tremendous rate compared to natural diffusion. There's quite a long list of diseases in non-humans spread through human trade. Human activity might also make animals more susceptible to disease in general through a weakening of overall health through pollution and environmental disruption. This effect is hard to quantif…

And animals transmit disease to humans. We are a part of the ecosystem after all, not outside it.

Re: Botswana: Lab tests to solve mystery of hundreds of dead elephants

#49
post #33

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I’m talking about the aggregate number. Buildings, cats, ... Our total footprint. I’m not sure of the exact wind turbine impact. It’s a rapidly growing form of energy. But that really is my point, people brush aside all the small impacts and we damage the environment in many small ways that really add up As for birds, the Audubon has some information. “ Wind turbines kill an estimated 140,000 to 328,000 birds each ye…

The American Bird Conservancy estimates that "In the United States alone, outdoor cats kill approximately 2.4 billion birds every year." [0] Although it's true that everything we do as a species / society has an impact on the environment, I think it's still important to look at things like this with perspective. Unfortunately, even green/renewable energy sources have a negative impact on the environment; wind isn't t…

Nuclear energy doesn't kill any birds, though, and is the safest form of energy in terms of (human) deaths per terawatt hour. This kind of data should inform our decision making.

Re: Botswana: Lab tests to solve mystery of hundreds of dead elephants

#50
post #48
post #44

Earlier quoted context omitted.

GP isn't blaming humans for animal diseases, but I am. Human trade spreads pathogens/diseases at a tremendous rate compared to natural diffusion. There's quite a long list of diseases in non-humans spread through human trade. Human activity might also make animals more susceptible to disease in general through a weakening of overall health through pollution and environmental disruption. This effect is hard to quantif…

And animals transmit disease to humans. We are a part of the ecosystem after all, not outside it.

We are animals just like any other, but our impact on the ecosystem at large is disproportionate.
Post reply on HN