Google-backed groups criticize Apple's new warnings on user tracking
41–50 of 229 posts
Re: Google-backed groups criticize Apple's new warnings on user tracking
#42> The group of European marketing firms said the pop-up warning and the limited ability to customize it still carries “a high risk of user refusal.” If you’re doing something and you know users are going to refuse to let you do it if they have the choice, don’t do it. Apple will give them a choice soon enough.
Re: Google-backed groups criticize Apple's new warnings on user tracking
#43Earlier quoted context omitted.
The difference being agency. You intend to open a bank account, buy a car, etc. “you“ [for the majority definition of ‘you’] had no idea that you were being secretly tracked, and (clutches pearls) you might even object to that. This is lifting the stone that’s been lying in the grass for the last decade or so, and watching all the creepy-crawlers scurry away out of the light, desperate to find somewhere to hide thems…
100%. And I love the fact that with Apple that agency slowly moves back to me - the ad industry can disappear overnight, and I don’t think life would get worse without it.
The agency has just shifted closer to Apple.
Which happens to align better with your interests, at least in this-five-minute-period.
Re: Google-backed groups criticize Apple's new warnings on user tracking
#44This ends when the origin site starts proxying requests to the ad aggregators via the site-native domain.
And the native domain owners end up taking full responsibility for the data liability
Re: Google-backed groups criticize Apple's new warnings on user tracking
#45Can tracking be useful, if used correctly?
Yes. Google search is infinitely more useful when mildly personalised rather than based on sheer popularity. If I search for drainage companies, I don't care who the most popular drainage company in the world is, ad it's highly likely to be weighted towards somewhere more populous. When I look at reviews for services, tracking can be used by Google and co to attempt to verify that the person who left a 5* review actu…
Re: Google-backed groups criticize Apple's new warnings on user tracking
#46My TV doesn't track me and it can still provide me ad.
Re: Google-backed groups criticize Apple's new warnings on user tracking
#47> The group of European marketing firms said the pop-up warning and the limited ability to customize it still carries “a high risk of user refusal.” If you’re doing something and you know users are going to refuse to let you do it if they have the choice, don’t do it. Apple will give them a choice soon enough.
I think what they mean is, they need finer controls on what data they would like to access and finer controls on informing what data are in use with the application.
Re: Google-backed groups criticize Apple's new warnings on user tracking
#48It's cool to conciously see the death of an industry and watch as marketing firms fail to migrate away from traditional ads. You can whinge and whine, but progress stops for nobody. It's also great to see Apple building this into iOS, definitely a highlight of WWDC, for me. I often see the location indicator come on and wonder what else I'm not seeing.
Progress ? There's money to be made and this looks like posturing and story telling to justify tapping in to another revenue stream on their platform.
Re: Google-backed groups criticize Apple's new warnings on user tracking
#49Can tracking be useful, if used correctly?
It isn't even usefull for advertising. Google keeps giving me french ads even when I speak dutch, live in the dutch half of Belgium, and have a http request header saying i speak dutch or english. I get ads for all kinds of stuff I don't care about. In fact, I get ads for things I can't even buy in my country or continent if I wanted it. If google would tune their ads to the language i ask them, based on the query I…
Re: Google-backed groups criticize Apple's new warnings on user tracking
#50Everyone should regularly be reminded that Google was caught paying professors to publish papers "friendly" to Google. https://www.wsj.com/articles/paying-professors-inside-google... Convincing the public that they are correct is how Google normalized the idea of sharing private information without oversight.