Earlier quoted context omitted.
No commitment at all. You can try it out first.
Thanks! One other Q: What about E2E security? Will you implement this for the comms between the bridges and the browsers? As I understand it I would run the bridges myself so it would make sense to have everything encrypted.
NovaChat: Multi-Network Chat
111–116 of 116 posts
Re: NovaChat: Multi-Network Chat
#112Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm making one, it wont be open-source but i'll respect privacy, allow free self-hosting... imagine a discord(call features) + slack(paid for companies). https://imgur.com/uSA8AMs.png https://imgur.com/P9ckNBn.png https://imgur.com/L9fDMKQ.png Ram usage is currently at 12-50mb on windows, up to 90mb with 50 messages with images(unoptimized, no virtual scrolling yet). The server will be a single binary, there is still…
If Sciter sounds interesting for the project, please contact me at https://sciter.com/contact_us/
Re: NovaChat: Multi-Network Chat
#113Earlier quoted context omitted.
The $10 price tag is a huge selling point for me. It signals a few things: 1) It's less likely to be abandoned. 2) It has less (hopefully no) incentive to secretly monetize me or my data. 3) Instead of being a side project for a handful of people, this has the potential to be the full-time project for at least one person. I was a heavy Pidgin user too, and when you're in an arms race with Google, Facebook, etc. (all…
1) It's less likely to be abandoned. Flawed assumption. A $10 monthly fee may severely limit it's use --- and the less it is used, the more likely it is to be abandoned. Personally, I think a $10 annual fee would be more reasonable but finding the magic sweetspot between users and dollars is a market research topic.
That's certainly true, but not at the same scale as FOSS.
> Personally, I think a $10 annual fee would be more reasonable but finding the magic sweetspot between users and dollars is a market research topic.
Sure, but it's much harder to bring 10$ a year to a 10$ a month price than the reverse. In one case you will make people angry and assuredly lose many customer, in the other, you may just gain more.
People always forget also the cost to support people over a "beta" software. That cost goes up the more customer he get, thus starting with less customers is certainly a good way to limit the amount of time spent on answering to support request.
Re: NovaChat: Multi-Network Chat
#114Re: NovaChat: Multi-Network Chat
#115Why are we repeating the past!
It's not repetition though. It's more like a spiral. I like modern chat apps better. My parents and brother can use Signal but they never could use the previous solutions. Plus, vibrant ecosystems are a good thing. Having several chat applications that compete on features is a good thing.
Re: NovaChat: Multi-Network Chat
#116Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's not repetition though. It's more like a spiral. I like modern chat apps better. My parents and brother can use Signal but they never could use the previous solutions. Plus, vibrant ecosystems are a good thing. Having several chat applications that compete on features is a good thing.
LOL yes it is. Not sure how old you are but we've been here before.