Live data from Hacker News

Forget Google, time to end the Visa-MasterCard duopoly

medium.com

531–540 of 547 posts

Re: Forget Google, time to end the Visa-MasterCard duopoly

#531
post #480

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Uhh my bank’s $30 to wire fee would beg to differ. Literally any fee less than that for a same-day transfer is worth it.

That’s what the banks pay to use zelle. The $30 wire fee is what a bank charges you to make money and dependent on the bank. Underlying systems near free to use like ach for domestic wires.

My point is the bank could easily pass the cost onto the customer.

Re: Forget Google, time to end the Visa-MasterCard duopoly

#532
post #288

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Paying by card is common, paying using a Credit Card not necessarily. Care to expand on that?

Here are the statistics for Denmark. "International Credit Card" are a small fraction of the total -- under 5%. The vast majority of transactions by number and value are by debit card. (The national/international distinction is between Dankort, the Danish card payment system only used on most debit cards here, and the foreign companies like Visa and MasterCard.) https://www.dst.dk/en/Statistik/emner/penge-og-kapitalm…

Dankort is dying though and some banks don't bother issuing it, some of my coworkers just have a Visa but not a Visa/Dankort. It works just as well. I doubt my Fitbit even supports the Dankort bit of the card, but I have never had any difficulty paying anywhere.

(For international readers, in Denmark, unlike Germany, the national debit card can be combined with a credit card on one card and then the terminal just chooses automatically)

Re: Forget Google, time to end the Visa-MasterCard duopoly

#533

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You're forgetting the percentages are on top of a ~$0.30 flat fee (though obviously this varies). So if you buy a $2 Coke, it's not a $0.054 fee (2.7%), it's $0.354 (or a whopping 17.7%). Maybe my dentist evades a few taxes, I dunno. But people buy cheap things at the bodega, so it probably is closer to the actual fees.

If the merchant doesn't offer the same cash discount for debit cards, then it's tax evasion. Debit card fees are a few cents, and the only reason to offer a big discount for cash, but not debit cards, is to not have the transaction on paper and hence evade taxes.

I don't think that "tax evasion" is a fair assessment.

This isn't the full picture. Debit card transactions might only be a few cents. But you still have to pay a fixed cost for the machine and related bits. For some businesses, that cost might be too high to justify.

Re: Forget Google, time to end the Visa-MasterCard duopoly

#534

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The article (particularly the linked tweet) somewhat addresses your point: Amex and Discover may offer a superficial degree of competition for consumers , but banks have to obey Mastercard and Visa's rules even when it comes to offering bank accounts to merchants, otherwise they (and therefore all their other account holders) can't participate in the 80% of card transactions that are on the Mastercard and Visa networ…

I have seen many stories of legal and legitimate businesses for things like weed (legal in the stores location) and legal porn sites getting their merchant accounts shut down because the payment processors just don't want them to deal with it leaving cash as the only option.

The hard reality is there’s a high rate of fraud and chargebacks in a lot of these types of businesses. It’s a tricky one for the merchants to manage but things like 3DS2 should help, maybe, if they ever sort it out properly...

Re: Forget Google, time to end the Visa-MasterCard duopoly

#535
post #533

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If the merchant doesn't offer the same cash discount for debit cards, then it's tax evasion. Debit card fees are a few cents, and the only reason to offer a big discount for cash, but not debit cards, is to not have the transaction on paper and hence evade taxes.

I don't think that "tax evasion" is a fair assessment. This isn't the full picture. Debit card transactions might only be a few cents. But you still have to pay a fixed cost for the machine and related bits. For some businesses, that cost might be too high to justify.

I have hundreds of experiences with small merchants, and it’s definitely a fair assessment. With chip and pin (at least in the US), there is no risk of chargebacks and the money gets transferred in at most 2 days. Total cost of accepting debit cards is minuscule, unless your a kid running a lemonade stand.

Re: Forget Google, time to end the Visa-MasterCard duopoly

#536

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> very impersonal, only-the-numbers-and-ROI matters. What would be a more personal approach when figuring out whether or not to loan the money to someone?

Deciding to lend to someone because you know them (they are "part of the community"), or they are a friend, or they are family. Of course it can be seen as more "humane" but it can also be seen as nepotism and/or a system excluding newcommers/strangers.

That sounds like the personal system of honor being used for credit worthiness. Which wound up leading to dueling while doing a worse job of the primary task than banker evaluations. Needless to say all around it was a worse system with worse outcomes and worse externalities.

Re: Forget Google, time to end the Visa-MasterCard duopoly

#537
post #524
post #515

Earlier quoted context omitted.

are you retarded? you can literally can pay with cash, or you know, a DEBIT card.

We've warned you before about personal attacks, so I've banned this account. If you don't want to be banned, you're welcome to email hn@ycombinator.com and give us reason to believe that you'll follow the rules in the future. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

You can suck the dick mate :)

Re: Forget Google, time to end the Visa-MasterCard duopoly

#538

I don't get it -- Amex and Discover are still providing healthy competition, so the "duopoly" the author complains about seems to be largely irrelevant. Competition between cards is thriving and consumers benefit -- witness the miniscule transaction fee the credit card companies keep after paying your rewards back of 2% to 5%, when you pay your bill on time. The article's main point is that such large companies are a…

The article (particularly the linked tweet) somewhat addresses your point: Amex and Discover may offer a superficial degree of competition for consumers , but banks have to obey Mastercard and Visa's rules even when it comes to offering bank accounts to merchants, otherwise they (and therefore all their other account holders) can't participate in the 80% of card transactions that are on the Mastercard and Visa networ…

I see your point from a merchant perspective. A thought: Why don't merchants in high-risk categories such as porn, gambling, etc. use debit transactions instead? Where they wait for funds to be transferred into their account and settled before providing goods and services.

Re: Forget Google, time to end the Visa-MasterCard duopoly

#539
post #469
post #17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> mainstream-ization of the crypto currencies And modern Tendermint[1]/Cosmos SDK-based chains or Solana are basically distributed databases, using consensus models similar to Raft, except with byzantine fault tolerance and Proof of Stake for leader selection. No mining, no forks, finality within seconds, large throughput. Pretty boring, actually, with little hype surrounding it - it just works, like a regular databa…

Does raft work when people are trying to attack it? My understanding of it in its normal application is fuzzy enough.

Raft is not safe against byzantine nodes, but these new consensus algorithms like Tendermint are.

Re: Forget Google, time to end the Visa-MasterCard duopoly

#540
post #157

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>In the US, interchange fees are extremely inflated to allow banks to recuperate the rewards they give out to distinguish their card offerings from one another. The 2% cashback has to come from somewhere. And that's a bad thing, because it's essentially the poor subsidizing the rich. People who aren't able to get credit cards (or the "good" cash back credit cards) tend to be worse off financially than people who do.

I think that's an oversimplification, because credit transactions tend to be 20%+ higher ticket sizes than cash purchases. In a way, the credit card surcharge baked in is something of a volume purchasing incentive. Further, the networks do explicitly permit cash discounts on card transactions, and always have. Merchants tend not to offer them, though.

A recent development: "Tap to pay" enabled transit systems are driving large increases in transaction volume.
Post reply on HN