Why would ANYONE imagine that companies would willingly put themselves in a ghetto? They know that the reason to encourage use of the .xxx TLD is to facilitate content filtering. They know that when their sites are blocked that's potential revenue lost, and if companies in the "erotica-industry" are good at anything it's making sure they make money.
India to block .XXX top-level domain
21–30 of 46 posts
Re: India to block .XXX top-level domain
#22And that's just a normal part of the way the world works.
Re: India to block .XXX top-level domain
#23... and .xxx becomes irrelevant. Really, if any .xxx website also needs a non-.xxx domain name, what's the point? (India won't be the last to block .xxx, I imagine.)
We all know that the sites selling adult content aren't likely to give up their existing .com domains. That sites containing user-submitted content that some would view as porn but which would themselves claim otherwise - RedBubble springs to mind - definitely aren't going to be interested in shifting to .xxx and that there will be a group campaigning for their own personal definition to be used in requiring people to move. And that sites containing, for example, material on sexual health or abortion are going to be pressured in some regions to shift to .xxx. The domain solves nothing well and creates so very many problems.
This whole issue was a very predictable problem from day one and I wish ICANN had had the courage to stand up for good sense and not grant the new TLD.
Re: India to block .XXX top-level domain
#24Google trends for sex and porn: http://www.google.com/trends?q=sex%2Cporn&ctab=0&geo... Indians are, unsurprisingly, very much into it.
Re: India to block .XXX top-level domain
#25You know it's fascinating how prudish a culture seems to be ties in to the levels and statistics of sexual abuse. In india words like sexual expression are a sin and a culture has emerged based on the obsession that sex is dirty. Which is centered around the glory of men and the purity of misogyny. At the same time India by some statistics ( http://www.icrw.org/publications/international-men-and-gende... ) has the hi…
I think it must be more complex and subtle than that. Isn't India the home of the Kama Sutra? Like, if any country can claim to be the world experts on sex, it's India, they even beat the Dutch.
Re: India to block .XXX top-level domain
#26Why would ANYONE imagine that companies would willingly put themselves in a ghetto? They know that the reason to encourage use of the .xxx TLD is to facilitate content filtering. They know that when their sites are blocked that's potential revenue lost, and if companies in the "erotica-industry" are good at anything it's making sure they make money.
Re: India to block .XXX top-level domain
#27Why would ANYONE imagine that companies would willingly put themselves in a ghetto? They know that the reason to encourage use of the .xxx TLD is to facilitate content filtering. They know that when their sites are blocked that's potential revenue lost, and if companies in the "erotica-industry" are good at anything it's making sure they make money.
Re: India to block .XXX top-level domain
#28Re: India to block .XXX top-level domain
#29hmm, They are keep blocking everything, still India's population is raising higher than any other country in this world.
I don't see why i got down voted. I am an Indian myself. Population is/going to be a biggest problem in India. This a truth.
According to my readings, two underappreciated reasons are:
1) unavailability of doctors/medical centers to do female sterilizations. Women literally riot in mobile sterilization camps if the camp closes before all of them are looked after. Men refuse to use condoms or get sterilized, but women do want to limit the number of children.
2) HUGE infant and child mortality among the poorer classes. If the probability of your child surviving to adulthood was low, you'd have three to five children too.
Neither of these are covered in your glib remark about porn. You should educate yourself more about your country.
Re: India to block .XXX top-level domain
#30... and .xxx becomes irrelevant. Really, if any .xxx website also needs a non-.xxx domain name, what's the point? (India won't be the last to block .xxx, I imagine.)
'Becomes' is an understatement. It seems to have been patently obvious to people who understand the Internet for many years that this wasn't going to achieve anything beyond the establishment of a new registry for people to sell domains in, yet a combination of the greedy and the ignorant meant it was always likely to actualy happen. We all know that the sites selling adult content aren't likely to give up their exis…