A primer on the cruel, tacit laws of type-level programming in Haskell

Post by anticristi » Sun, Jun 28, 2020, 9:52 AM UTC

Fr33maan wrote: post #4

anticristi wrote: post #2

Does anyone else think the title is sexist by today's standards?

I have strictly no idea why OP is using women nor in the title or illustrations

Post by [deleted] » Sun, Jun 28, 2020, 9:52 AM UTC

Post by cdash » Sun, Jun 28, 2020, 9:55 AM UTC

anticristi wrote: post #11

Fr33maan wrote: post #4

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I have strictly no idea why OP is using women nor in the title or illustrations

It reinforces the stereotype that only women are mean. I would dislike a title reinforcing stereotypes about me: "Detox for Alcoholic East Europeans: Haskell type enforcement".

Post by docdeek » Sun, Jun 28, 2020, 9:58 AM UTC

anticristi wrote: post #11

Fr33maan wrote: post #4

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I have strictly no idea why OP is using women nor in the title or illustrations

It reinforces the stereotype that only women are mean. I would dislike a title reinforcing stereotypes about me: "Detox for Alcoholic East Europeans: Haskell type enforcement".

Post by jpxw » Sun, Jun 28, 2020, 10:01 AM UTC

ORioN63 wrote: post #9

Fr33maan wrote: post #4

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I have strictly no idea why OP is using women nor in the title or illustrations

He's drawing a comparison between Haskell kinds and concepts shown in the (once) popular teenage movie "Mean Girls".