It does make me wonder how many apps on Android also do this and go completely undetected. Hopefully Google adds something similar.
Of course it's still possible to check the clipboard when the app receives focus, just like on iOS.
271–280 of 613 posts
It does make me wonder how many apps on Android also do this and go completely undetected. Hopefully Google adds something similar.
Of course it's still possible to check the clipboard when the app receives focus, just like on iOS.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Genuine question, why don't companies proxy tracker data through a single host that the app also depends on to serve data? That way it wouldn't be possible for users to block individual hosts to prevent tracking. I guess it's not worth the effort though because laypeople won't care either way?
Most trackers are 3rd parties that require you to go through their hosts. Additionally, these trackers are usually picked out by business analysts / product managers on different teams - so marketing my have their own tracking solution, sales might have their own, and engineering might have their own. Tends to be faster/easier to plop javascript on a page than engineering your own tracking/analytics pipeline at early…
This. I remember at my last company, we ended up with 8 or 9 different analytics tools all getting different data and showing one or two "cool views" the PM had put together.
It's such a big problem that solutions like segment.io exist to broker your events to N different downstream solutions.
Truly, this is the darkest timeline.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Apples walled garden approach is not necessary for any of this though (nor does it even make it easier). You can introduce sandboxing, fine grained permissions etc without locking devs and consumers into a controlled app store - these are OS features, not app store features.
And yet no one else has
It seems like a ton of apps are abusing this feature: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pRSWdtoUAjo I categorize this as another reason why "just trust us," just isn't acceptable enough when it comes to data privacy and ownership. Companies just cannot be trusted to treat their users' data with respect given the option of: profit or privacy. (sourced from reddit: https://old.reddit.com/r/apple/comments/hejb9i/ios14_cat…
In that Reddit thread the author of a Reddit app mentions that they look at the clipboard to see if you have a Reddit link, and offer to open that page in the app (as iOS offers no better way). On Twitter I saw a. Doing app mention they trigger the notification on every key press because they have custom ‘paste’ button that only shows when you have something copied.
Really nice app in general though.
I think this is due to the flame war or rating system of HN, where active discussions are relegated to oblivion. Instead of trusting biased and funded media - we here need to introspect, without us being silenced.
May be we are mostly left so we don't have a much stronger opinion unless its right - is that the case?. Just curious - why the slack?.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I did that many years ago but with email... I sent a secret link from and to a microft email address and it was then accessed by a microsoft bot...
Of course, they inspect received/sent email for spam/antivirus purposes
iOS already prompts for other things like "app Foo would like to know your location: Never, Only when open, Always". Users are use to this. I'd love a popup like: "TikTok wants to see what you've copied into your clipboard: Never, Once, Always, Uninstall that spyware". Then I could make informed decisions, like sure, my package tracker can see if there's a FedEx URL in my clipboard. I'm OK with that. There's literall…
e.g. Time of stealing password from clipboard + time of my HN comment.
I've been long weary of this, android 10 has made some changes like allowing only IME & in-focus apps to access the clipboard. Not a fool-proof way to prevent the issue.
One more reason to destroy app duopoly, switch to pure Linux OS [1][2][3] and force app publishers to stick with web apps/PWA with more user control.
[1]https://store.pine64.org/product/pinephone-community-edition...
[2]https://postmarketos.org/blog/2020/06/15/pinephone-postmarke...
It seems like a ton of apps are abusing this feature: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pRSWdtoUAjo I categorize this as another reason why "just trust us," just isn't acceptable enough when it comes to data privacy and ownership. Companies just cannot be trusted to treat their users' data with respect given the option of: profit or privacy. (sourced from reddit: https://old.reddit.com/r/apple/comments/hejb9i/ios14_cat…
People love to hate on Apple but the fact is, they continue to release features to better showcase or restrict developers that abuse your privacy. The "walled garden" also ensures they apply a ton of checks to apps to better restrict abuses. Sometimes it's overly sensitive and bad things happen, but in general it's awesome that over time it becomes harder and harder to get away with apps blatantly spying on you.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Fine-grained permissions aren’t useful if an application is going to request access to everything anyway - and non-technical or non-privacy-conscious users will click-through any and all permission prompts so [they can see the dancing bunnies]( https://blog.codinghorror.com/the-dancing-bunnies-problem/ ). In the case of very popular, aggressively-marketed, apps like TikTok and Facebook’s: the lack of easy side-loadin…
At least in Android (not familiar with iOS) you can deny apps access to any and all permissions, the features just won't work. I.e. if you deny Snapchat access to the camera you can still browse the app, read messages etc - you just won't be able to take any photos.
I don't think Apple would allow that kind of permissions abuse, but apparently Google does.