Live data from Hacker News

Google Blew a Ten-Year Lead

secondbreakfast.co

241–250 of 576 posts

Re: Google Blew a Ten-Year Lead

#242

Earlier quoted context omitted.

(author here) i promise this is not an ad for Hey haha, have no affiliation with basecamp and wish i was that good at content marketing.

It's kind of fishy this is the only comment OP responded to. And OP's other most recent comment was on a basecamp thread

You really don’t know DHH or BaseCamp. I can guarantee you that he has enough of a reach and platform not to engage in shady guerrilla marketing

Re: Google Blew a Ten-Year Lead

#243

Earlier quoted context omitted.

One of my employers was spun out twice, after having been acquired years ago. It was sort of a joke to tell people who the owners were. It made no goddamned sense. Sure, we had customers in common, but so do Xerox and people who lease out coffee machines. The toner-flavored coffee jokes practically write themselves. They just got onto a growth tear and bought a bunch of things they shouldn’t, and eventually rounded u…

https://area120.google.com/

Does “sign up for early access” just mean get sneak previews, or that this is a new thing?

If the latter, then good for them but another thing they should have done ten years ago.

Re: Google Blew a Ten-Year Lead

#244

No kidding. Early adopter of gsuite for domains (work and personal email). The google home devices CANNOT get your calendar from your google calendar. My Alexa device can easily. The thing of stuff just stagnating and no care to scrub the rough corners is crazy. They have some things they keep on improving. I think youtube is there (after the dumped plus thank goodness). Chrome seems to be moving along nicely. I used…

While agree with you that google has been dropping the ball, you've got to use the online version of Office 365, it is awful. Like shockingly terrible. Gsuite is 10x better, no exaggeration. Apple's online office stuff is equally a joke. Google blew a 10 year lead but lucky for them, the other possible large competitors are doing even worse.

Re: Google Blew a Ten-Year Lead

#245
And yet the stock is at $1400+ this morning. I wonder if you did a survey and described Google without using the name Google, IE: single line of business responsible for 90%+ of revenue, limited switching costs for consumers, regularly kills products consumers like, would anyone think this is a stock worth holding? What weird times we live in.

Re: Google Blew a Ten-Year Lead

#246

No kidding. Early adopter of gsuite for domains (work and personal email). The google home devices CANNOT get your calendar from your google calendar. My Alexa device can easily. The thing of stuff just stagnating and no care to scrub the rough corners is crazy. They have some things they keep on improving. I think youtube is there (after the dumped plus thank goodness). Chrome seems to be moving along nicely. I used…

While agree with you that google has been dropping the ball, you've got to use the online version of Office 365, it is awful . Like shockingly terrible. Gsuite is 10x better, no exaggeration. Apple's online office stuff is equally a joke. Google blew a 10 year lead but lucky for them, the other possible large competitors are doing even worse.

Although they haven't evolved much in recent years, I still find most Gsuite apps to actually be quite good. What is terrible is Drive itself. File management is just a joke with Drive.

Re: Google Blew a Ten-Year Lead

#247

No kidding. Early adopter of gsuite for domains (work and personal email). The google home devices CANNOT get your calendar from your google calendar. My Alexa device can easily. The thing of stuff just stagnating and no care to scrub the rough corners is crazy. They have some things they keep on improving. I think youtube is there (after the dumped plus thank goodness). Chrome seems to be moving along nicely. I used…

> They have some things they keep on improving. I think youtube is there...

I mostly use YouTube to watch series - PBS Space Time, World War Two, Crash Course etc. YouTube is absolutely horrible at navigating through these series - it is difficult to find where you left, it is difficult to find the next episode, there is absolutely no user comfort.

Re: Google Blew a Ten-Year Lead

#248
post #84

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If your “actual work” is designing documents for printing on dead tree paper, then sure. If your work is modern digital-first collaboration there are way more effective choices these days.

> If your “actual work” is designing documents for printing on dead tree paper, then sure I would reckon 99+% of most people's use cases for something like Google Docs falls into this category.

I highly doubt this. It might be, might be, a majority. But there are lots of academic, personal, and even business cases that are digital only or digital mostly.

Re: Google Blew a Ten-Year Lead

#249
post #232

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You tell a nice story with the data, but I cannot dismiss the potential selection bias: perhaps these PMs were not up to Google's standards and were invited to leave?

yes, i am aware of it. on the other hand which PR-ides itself with one of the hardest hiring selection process on the market it might be a statement about this process.

Does Google's project manager interview panel have a reputation for rigor, or is this just the engineering panel reputation rubbing off?

Re: Google Blew a Ten-Year Lead

#250

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> _open a new market_ for advertising, and to gather data for the same Yes, thank you. "When something is free then you are the product". And for the case of Google, someone pays Google shitloads of money to buy YOUR data. This applies to many companies, but to Google most of all. Also, the further they keep users away from Win10 (where MS siphons everything) and they keep them locked in Android/Chrome operating syst…

> Yes, thank you. "When something is free then you are the product" So, when I am using Libreoffice, who sees me as their product ?

It's a rule of thumb. No, not every costless product is monetizing your use of it. FOSS is especially counter to this rule.

In the case of web-based tools that are owned and operated by big advertising companies, I think it's a fairly safe bet. As always, think critically about each instance and consider the implications of the software and products you use.

Post reply on HN