Sequoia gives photo-sharing startup more money than they gave Google
1–10 of 185 posts
Re: Sequoia gives photo-sharing startup more money than they gave Google
#2Re: Sequoia gives photo-sharing startup more money than they gave Google
#3"All of your contacts are presented in a list of thumbnails ordered by how strong your connection is to that user. Whenever Color detects that you’re physically near another user (in other words, that you’re hanging out), your bond on the app gets a little stronger. So when you fire up the app and jump to your list of contacts, you’ll probably see your close friends and family members listed first. But if you don’t see a friend for a long time, they’ll gradually flow down the list, and eventually their photos will fade from color to black-and-white.
...If you fired up Color in that restaurant example from earlier, you’d only be able to see photos that had been taken by friends and strangers within 100 feet of that restaurant. That is, unless you jump to your social connections. Tap on your best friend’s profile photo, and you’ll then be able to see all of the photos that have recently been taken within 100 feet of them. In other words, Color is trying to give you a way to see everything that’s going on around you, and everything that’s going on around the people you care about."
"Color is also making use of every phone sensor it can access. The application was demoed to me in the basement of Color’s office — where there was no cell signal or GPS reception. But the app still managed to work normally, automatically placing the people who were sitting around me in the same group. It does this using a variety of tricks: it uses the camera to check for lighting conditions, and even uses the phone’s microphone to ‘listen’ to the ambient surroundings. If two phones are capturing similar audio, then they’re probably close to each other."
Re: Sequoia gives photo-sharing startup more money than they gave Google
#4 "But how exactly is Color going to make “wheelbarrows of
cash”... the company is still very early on, but it
eventually plans to offer businesses a self-serve platform
for running deals and ads
$41 Million for a photo sharing app and this is the best they came up with? You gotta be kidding me.Re: Sequoia gives photo-sharing startup more money than they gave Google
#5I am not sure why the article did not have the link for the application.
edit - never mind they updated the article.
Re: Sequoia gives photo-sharing startup more money than they gave Google
#6Re: Sequoia gives photo-sharing startup more money than they gave Google
#7Re: Sequoia gives photo-sharing startup more money than they gave Google
#8Re: Sequoia gives photo-sharing startup more money than they gave Google
#9It's mobile, it's social, and it's local! They managed to hit all the buzzwords in one startup!
Re: Sequoia gives photo-sharing startup more money than they gave Google
#10I wonder how much color.com cost?