Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Gitlab 13.1

about.gitlab.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

31–40 of 90 posts

Re: Gitlab 13.1

#32

Post by john_cogs »

AaronFriel wrote: post #3

If anyone from GitLab is reading this, these pages are locked in a refresh loop. I can't read the content because it is scrolling/moving slightly with every refresh which is happening constantly. Latest version of Chrome stable, uBlock Origin in default config, HTTPS Everywhere, React/Redux devtools are the extensions I have installed. I let the page run for 30 seconds and: * CPU usage on two cores was at 100% * 2,94…

Thanks for reporting this. I created an issue to report this to the Gitlab website team. You can follow along and anything I might have missed here: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/issues/8052

Re: Gitlab 13.1

#33

Post by dan1234 »

Looks like WebAuthn is still missing, even though there seem to have been merge requests featuring it forever!

Anyone know which milestone it’ll be merged into?

Re: Gitlab 13.1

#34

Post by Fogest »

AaronFriel wrote: post #3

If anyone from GitLab is reading this, these pages are locked in a refresh loop. I can't read the content because it is scrolling/moving slightly with every refresh which is happening constantly. Latest version of Chrome stable, uBlock Origin in default config, HTTPS Everywhere, React/Redux devtools are the extensions I have installed. I let the page run for 30 seconds and: * CPU usage on two cores was at 100% * 2,94…

Same problem as you on Chrome. I thought it was just me. I see requests happening to many different sites.

Re: Gitlab 13.1

#35

Post by jtwaleson »

I somehow had a feeling Gitlab would be bought this year, but the list dramatically falls apart upon closer inspection:

- Google: will never work, completely different mindset and engineering culture. Gitlab feels way too unrefined (in a good sense).

- AWS: Gitlab is already too different from their tech, and will never be that tightly coupled with the rest of AWS.

- IBM: :') they wish

- MS: already has GitHub

Any others?

I think any giant company would have a hard time integrating all-remote Gitlab.

Re: Gitlab 13.1

#36

Post by travbrack »

jtwaleson wrote: post #35

I somehow had a feeling Gitlab would be bought this year, but the list dramatically falls apart upon closer inspection: - Google: will never work, completely different mindset and engineering culture. Gitlab feels way too unrefined (in a good sense). - AWS: Gitlab is already too different from their tech, and will never be that tightly coupled with the rest of AWS. - IBM: :') they wish - MS: already has GitHub Any ot…

I think you're underestimating the power of a boatload of cash. All of the companies you listed could afford to buy gitlab.

Re: Gitlab 13.1

#37

Post by stock_toaster »

jtwaleson wrote: post #35

I somehow had a feeling Gitlab would be bought this year, but the list dramatically falls apart upon closer inspection: - Google: will never work, completely different mindset and engineering culture. Gitlab feels way too unrefined (in a good sense). - AWS: Gitlab is already too different from their tech, and will never be that tightly coupled with the rest of AWS. - IBM: :') they wish - MS: already has GitHub Any ot…

> I think any giant company would have a hard time integrating all-remote Gitlab.

Atlassian maybe? (shudder)

Re: Gitlab 13.1

#38

Post by jtwaleson »

travbrack wrote: post #36
jtwaleson wrote: post #35

I somehow had a feeling Gitlab would be bought this year, but the list dramatically falls apart upon closer inspection: - Google: will never work, completely different mindset and engineering culture. Gitlab feels way too unrefined (in a good sense). - AWS: Gitlab is already too different from their tech, and will never be that tightly coupled with the rest of AWS. - IBM: :') they wish - MS: already has GitHub Any ot…

I think you're underestimating the power of a boatload of cash. All of the companies you listed could afford to buy gitlab.

Sure they could, but it still needs to make sense from either a growth or a defense play. I don't see that for any of these companies.

Re: Gitlab 13.1

#39

Post by matthewcford »

dindresto wrote: post #4

With every release I wonder why our team is even paying for Gitlab Bronze. It seems to offer no value at all, might as well go for the free tier and save a thousand dollars a year.

Same boat, although with GitHub pricing changes it’s more advantageous to switch. The fact that the security and dependency management is locked at gold when they are free on Github is annoying.

Re: Gitlab 13.1

#40

Post by matthewcford »

matthewcford wrote: post #39
dindresto wrote: post #4

With every release I wonder why our team is even paying for Gitlab Bronze. It seems to offer no value at all, might as well go for the free tier and save a thousand dollars a year.

Same boat, although with GitHub pricing changes it’s more advantageous to switch. The fact that the security and dependency management is locked at gold when they are free on Github is annoying.

Moving breakman into core is nice but not enough
Post reply on HN