I'm surprised we didn't get any performance numbers. Either raw power or at least power efficiency and projected battery life improvements. Seeing as this is a major reason for the transition (according to them), it feels very weird. They're shipping a 'Development Transition Kit' Mac mini with an A12Z this week, so it's not like the numbers are going to stay private for a long time. Even if there's an NDA, someone's…
Apple announces it will switch to its own processors for future Macs
131–140 of 1001 posts
Re: Apple announces it will switch to its own processors for future Macs
#132Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm in the market for a new laptop, and if I knew how long the Intel macs would be supported, I could see myself picking one up. Unfortunately, nothing was said about that so I guess I'm holding off.
They said the transition should take 2 years. I wouldn't expect much more than that.
Re: Apple announces it will switch to its own processors for future Macs
#133This is a demo so take with huge grain of salt, but the x86 performance looks solid... better than I expected considering it's based on an iPad CPU.
IDK, "look how good our CPU support is by running a several year old GPU limited game" fell a bit flat for me.
Re: Apple announces it will switch to its own processors for future Macs
#134Earlier quoted context omitted.
Curious that they said nothing about virtualizing Windows. That can’t be a mistake or oversight. Odd.
Indeed - only talked about Linux, of which there are of course ARM versions available.
Not all packages are available in ARM flavors.
Re: Apple announces it will switch to its own processors for future Macs
#135Rosetta 2 - the interesting bit was that it was going to pre-translate binaries instead of at runtime. The implications for actual VM emulation is that Rosetta won't work for run time environments like OS emulation. They touched on it briefly with the emulation technologies bit, but it looks like it will be separate from, and likely much less performant than Rosetta.
Re: Apple announces it will switch to its own processors for future Macs
#136Re: Apple announces it will switch to its own processors for future Macs
#137Tim Cook just said they have new intel macs in the pipeline. Those will go over like a lead balloon.
Apple announced the PPC in 1994 and sold new 68K Macs for 3 years at least.
Re: Apple announces it will switch to its own processors for future Macs
#138I really wonder if this will result in the Mac-ification of iPad. Would love to finally run a MacOS environment on a tablet.
Re: Apple announces it will switch to its own processors for future Macs
#139So, if I install numpy via conda on a Mac now, it's backed by Intel MKL and is thus amazingly fast. What will it be replaced with? Has anyone at Apple thought about use cases like this?..
Re: Apple announces it will switch to its own processors for future Macs
#140Earlier quoted context omitted.
IDK, "look how good our CPU support is by running a several year old GPU limited game" fell a bit flat for me.
I think your expectations for what emulation is capable of are set a bit high. The fact that it is able to emulate a game that's a few years old at decent frame rate is more than acceptable. You didn't see Microsoft demoing games for their Surface on ARM systems at all and for good reason.
> You didn't see Microsoft demoing games for their Surface on ARM systems at all and for good reason.
Those were also lower-end computers with poor GPUs.