I don't understand why you would even publicize this. Just stop counting those users' votes, if that's what you want to do? There's enough fuzz in the vote counts that no one would notice, and you wouldn't have any controversy on your hands.
Reddit started banning accounts that voted for content “against their policies”
21–30 of 401 posts
Re: Reddit started banning accounts that voted for content “against their policies”
#22They sometimes come up with measures like this, while routinely ignoring the development of horrible communities that they're aware of (since some users take any possible opportunity to mention them to the admins and are met with silence or half measures).
They even came up with the concept of quarantined subreddits. I honestly can't think of a single honest reason for them existing. Once you've deemed a community so harmful that you don't want people accidentally stumbling into it, why go out of your way to allow it to exist behind a curtain, instead of just outright banning it (unless you want to support it discreetly).
To be clear, I'm not accusing reddit admins of shadily supporting horrible communities. I'm just saying that, from the perspective of a user that sees them fight the battle, they're doing it so badly that it almost seems they don't want to win, and I wonder what's happening behind the scenes for that to happen.
Re: Reddit started banning accounts that voted for content “against their policies”
#23Re: Reddit started banning accounts that voted for content “against their policies”
#24Eventually reddit will go the way of digg and fade into irrelevance.
Re: Reddit started banning accounts that voted for content “against their policies”
#25Eventually reddit will go the way of digg and fade into irrelevance.
Re: Reddit started banning accounts that voted for content “against their policies”
#26There is an alternative to the group think/hive mind called https://gab.com/ but it’s also a cesspool or horrible people sharing horrible ideas. Not sure what makes sense.
Re: Reddit started banning accounts that voted for content “against their policies”
#27To think that the reddit administrators would go so far as to ban people for even interacting with content that THEY deem problematic.
Reddit is dead and no one I know uses it anymore.
EDIT: - In case anyone is interested; here is the censored post that I was referring to https://old.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/h9ctho/serious_a...
Re: Reddit started banning accounts that voted for content “against their policies”
#28Re: Reddit started banning accounts that voted for content “against their policies”
#29There is an alternative to the group think/hive mind called https://gab.com/ but it’s also a cesspool or horrible people sharing horrible ideas. Not sure what makes sense.
I tend to follow Voltaire's ‘I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.' I agree with your assessment of the quality of ideas thrown around there, but I'd prefer a world where the internet allowed sites like that to exist, rather than one that's increasingly owned & distributed by giant corporate conglomerates with significant oversight into the discussion of its members, lest you get assigned to "re-education camps" or some BS like that.
And let's not pretend that Reddit doesn't want to be one of those giant conglomerates...