Live data from Hacker News

Reuters killed their RSS feeds?

reuters.com

21–30 of 127 posts

Re: Reuters killed their RSS feeds?

#21
That stinks. I was subscribed for my Kodi ticker feed. I've found that Reuters does the best job at putting actual information in the headline and not just using it as an opportunity for clickbait.

Fictional Example:

- CNN: Trump said what? Democrats outraged by latest tweet.

- Reuters: Trump tweets 'looting leads to shooting' in response to BLM Protests

Re: Reuters killed their RSS feeds?

#22

The death of RSS is the death of the federated web model where users view and consume the content they want to. Modern alternatives like Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram do not serve users in the same way. Users happily consume the content the platform feeds to them, without much say in it. It's an eerie return to the pre-Internet days, where the only choices a consumer had were to change the TV channel / radio dial…

[deleted]

Re: Reuters killed their RSS feeds?

#23
post #2

Is there an alternate source for this? It's how I got my news up until it shut down.

Depends on what your after really. In my case subscribing to a nation-wide newspaper feels like a good solution. Or is it an RSS feed specifically that you want?

Re: Reuters killed their RSS feeds?

#25
post #2

Is there an alternate source for this? It's how I got my news up until it shut down.

Is there an alternate source for this? It's how I got my news up until it shut down. You could always pay for the news you consume.

I’m a huge proponent for paid news, but that’s a bit of a strawman argument. Reuters hasn’t made their rss paid, or removed all of their free news content.

It is sad that we’re losing a uniquely powerful mechanism for consuming news because we can’t find a business model that supports it. People Who consumed RSS news can’t just pay and get an equivalent experience. RSS allows filtering and combining news sources in ways that make them much more valuable, and can’t be reproduced just by paying for a single subscription to a publisher.

Re: Reuters killed their RSS feeds?

#26

The death of RSS is the death of the federated web model where users view and consume the content they want to. Modern alternatives like Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram do not serve users in the same way. Users happily consume the content the platform feeds to them, without much say in it. It's an eerie return to the pre-Internet days, where the only choices a consumer had were to change the TV channel / radio dial…

What death of RSS? There are literally zero blogs I want to follow that don't support it.

Re: Reuters killed their RSS feeds?

#27
99% of times it's just an error on their end and they eventually come back.

Why: I've created popurls fame back in the days (now hvper.com) and I can tell you that this would be the first prominent case that a major outlet would eventually give up on offering a feed. RSS is alive and kicking and its death is just something the tech community loves to agonize over and over again.

Re: Reuters killed their RSS feeds?

#29
post #13
post #4

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No ads to be pushed in an RSS feed.

I see this argument pretty regularly, but I don't understand it. Of course you can run ads in RSS feeds; you can put whatever you want in an RSS feed.

adds in RSS offer much less tracking, spying, etc... of course they are still ads, but that's not the same animal at all.
Post reply on HN