Live data from Hacker News

Osborning the Mac, or not

mondaynote.com

251–253 of 253 posts

Re: Osborning the Mac, or not

#251
post #6

It seems like the de jour solution to the Osborne Effect is to create the consumer expectation of significant price increases. People still buy last gen hardware nowadays well after the new hotness is out, because the new generation often costs 50%-100% more for a year or two. If Osborne had said "The next versions will be even better, and only cost $5000 more!" people would have kept buying the Osborne 1.

There will be a bigger backlash if they mislead customers on the price.

I really doubt there would be a major backlash if a company like Apple said "Due to , we are able to offer the new iPhone for $XXX dollars less than we expected!"

Consumers rarely complain about lower prices than they expect.

Hell, tons of companies offer their products at an MSRP that drops massively within weeks.

Re: Osborning the Mac, or not

#252

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Filemaker is different, it's not an Apple product anymore. Claris was spun off into a separate company.

I think Claris are still owned by Apple though?

Nope, they were fully spun off. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Claris

Re: Osborning the Mac, or not

#253
post #40

I'm pretty convinced Apple's transition strategy for existing software will be "Recompile, retest, republish": No built-in emulation or other support for x64 binaries. In the past transitions they had to have a strong compatibility story. But I think that's not nearly as important anymore. For software that is being actively developed, releasing fat ARM/x64 (or maybe fat bitcode/x64) binaries can be worked into a rel…

> No built-in emulation or other support for x64 binaries.

Well, I got that wrong. Rosetta 2 and some kind of virtualization support (no idea yet what that means)

Post reply on HN