What gets me most about these fools is they completely ignore how much such a huge fake job would cost. It would be so expensive that you could cut the budget in half and just...go to the moon.
Neil Armstrong's reply to a Moon landing skeptic
11–20 of 201 posts
Re: Neil Armstrong's reply to a Moon landing skeptic
#12What gets me most about these fools is they completely ignore how much such a huge fake job would cost. It would be so expensive that you could cut the budget in half and just...go to the moon.
Re: Neil Armstrong's reply to a Moon landing skeptic
#13Re: Neil Armstrong's reply to a Moon landing skeptic
#14Re: Neil Armstrong's reply to a Moon landing skeptic
#15But this is a core tenant of freedom of speech and information, so not matter how objectively wrong, I'll defend the teacher's right to say it.
There will always be those who fall into fringe ideas regardless of how disprovable they are because they choose to believe the moon is made of cheese. The tool of critical thinking not being applied well can easily end up here.
Re: Neil Armstrong's reply to a Moon landing skeptic
#16Well, it certainly wouldn’t be the first time that happened, by any government. The “Weapons of Mass Destruction” lie could be described using the exact same sentence, and that wasn’t even twenty years ago.
Not defending the moon landing doubters, or conspiracy theorists in general, but: the proper response to these things isn’t to point and laugh. It’s to recognize their origins - a (often justified) loss of trust in institutions and governmental narratives - and work on addressing and fixing them.
Edit: commenters seem to be focusing on a single example, which I presented as an illustrative point for a much deeper and more important phenomenon. You’re missing the forest for the trees.
Re: Neil Armstrong's reply to a Moon landing skeptic
#17Armstrong's reference to the moon reflectors brought back memories of this classic Big Bang clip: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-e5CtbbZL-k&feature=youtu.be In this context I can easily imagine that Zack is the teacher.
Re: Neil Armstrong's reply to a Moon landing skeptic
#18The letter is great, but it doesn’t have the same impact Buzz Aldrins reaction to the skeptic had.
Re: Neil Armstrong's reply to a Moon landing skeptic
#19They would have you believe that the United States Government perpetrated a gigantic fraud on its citizenry. Well, it certainly wouldn’t be the first time that happened, by any government. The “Weapons of Mass Destruction” lie could be described using the exact same sentence, and that wasn’t even twenty years ago. Not defending the moon landing doubters, or conspiracy theorists in general, but: the proper response to…
Stop being contrarian for the sake of it .
Re: Neil Armstrong's reply to a Moon landing skeptic
#20What gets me most about these fools is they completely ignore how much such a huge fake job would cost. It would be so expensive that you could cut the budget in half and just...go to the moon.
Isn't this the joke? That if Kubrick really was going to be employed by the US Government to "fake" a moon landing that, with his penchant for realistic set design, he would've filmed it on site.