If this is really the problem conservatives claim it is, there's a simple solution: Get a backbone and delete your social media accounts. Most platforms (unlike HN) provide account deletion functions (though some keep them well-hidden).
Tom Cotton's editorial was not run in social media. This is much, much bigger than social media. Also, do you understand that you're advocating self-censorship? How is that a positive development for a liberal democracy, when large swathes of the population just remove their voices from the public debate out of fear for the "shoot first, don't ask questions" social justice mob?
Welcome to America’s Cultural Revolution
51–60 of 110 posts
Re: Welcome to America’s Cultural Revolution
#52Re: Welcome to America’s Cultural Revolution
#53Earlier quoted context omitted.
This strikes me as awfully glib. My parents aren't racists and they empathize with the police reforms that BLM is advocating for (so do I). But they were raised with the belief that racism was due to prejudice. To them, racism is judging someone by their skin color / background rather than the actions of that individual. They don't buy into the idea of microaggressions and implicit bias. To many nowadays that makes t…
We're absolutely doing things that future generations will find abhorrent. And as our thinking as humans evolves, I hope we'll also change our behavior. But let's not make the perfect the enemy of the good. When we are aware that behaviors and symbols are hurtful to other humans, and we genuinely believe that other people should be able to live without fear, then we should change both. We're not going to get it 100%…
Re: Welcome to America’s Cultural Revolution
#54Earlier quoted context omitted.
Maybe you aren't a moderate? I mean, you literally are calling anyone who participates in the internet these days insane. That hardly scans as a moderate take.
The ground has shifted. Someone who was a moderate in 1995 would be considered "alt-right" today.
Re: Welcome to America’s Cultural Revolution
#55> Sacramento Kings play-by-play announcer Grant Napear, who’s been calling games since 1988, was forced to resign after saying the words “all lives matter.” I thought 'All lives matter' was commonsense.
"All Lives Matter" taken literally totally is compatible with "Black Lives Matter". However "All Lives Matter" when said is not meant literally. No one said all livers matter until someone said "Black Lives Matters". It's an attempt to shut down "Black Lives Matter". And the opposite of "Black Lives Matter" isn't the opposite of "All Lives Matter", the opposite is Black Lives Don't Matter, which is what is happening…
Re: Welcome to America’s Cultural Revolution
#56Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
What does Putin have to do with anything? He runs a country that is not remotely communist (since at least 1991, nearly thirty years ago, last I checked)
Then again, the US doesn't seem to have any equivalent to: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Don_Camillo_and_Peppone
Re: Welcome to America’s Cultural Revolution
#57Earlier quoted context omitted.
Maybe you aren't a moderate? I mean, you literally are calling anyone who participates in the internet these days insane. That hardly scans as a moderate take.
The ground has shifted. Someone who was a moderate in 1995 would be considered "alt-right" today.
Re: Welcome to America’s Cultural Revolution
#58Earlier quoted context omitted.
"All Lives Matter" taken literally totally is compatible with "Black Lives Matter". However "All Lives Matter" when said is not meant literally. No one said all livers matter until someone said "Black Lives Matters". It's an attempt to shut down "Black Lives Matter". And the opposite of "Black Lives Matter" isn't the opposite of "All Lives Matter", the opposite is Black Lives Don't Matter, which is what is happening…
As a counterpoint, look at what happens with the "it's okay to be white" posters. Completely benign, commonsense and not a reaction to something. And yet...
Re: Welcome to America’s Cultural Revolution
#59Re: Welcome to America’s Cultural Revolution
#60Earlier quoted context omitted.
To have an opposing view so toxic, amoral, and ethically vapid to risk being beaten, is to risk being beaten. Freedom of speech does not mean freedom of consequence. Advise practicing empathy.
You're saying that anyone who gets beaten for their opinion had it coming? Truly we live in evil times.
Of course people should disagree, experience dialectics, have conversations, debate, spar, parry, and enjoy rigorous conversation.
But then there are sentiments that are beyond the pale. Should NAMBLA be allowed a late night talk show, or an NYT editorial to espouse their views? Should neo-nazis be given a soapbox, or even worse, access to a highly-targeted ad network to radicalize young men? Should Richard Spencer be punched in the face for being a bigoted piece of human garbage?
Should I be allowed to call him that? Is violence ever justified?