Live data from Hacker News

For black CEOs in Silicon Valley, humiliation is a part of doing business

bloomberg.com

641–650 of 828 posts

Re: For black CEOs in Silicon Valley, humiliation is a part of doing business

#641
post #613

It's always fascinating to me how the most liberal and progressive areas of our society are the ones who exhibit the most functional racism. This is the manifestation of the bigotry of low expectations that is so engrained in Silicon Valley. When you live your life grouping people of a certain skin color into a protected class that you the hero white person need to save, you automatically assume that every person you…

You're sorely mistaken.

Re: For black CEOs in Silicon Valley, humiliation is a part of doing business

#642
post #597

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>It is humiliating This is a common theme in a number of stories in this thread that I don't understand. How and why does being a victim of racism translate into shame? When I am subject to injustice, my emotional reaction has always been fury and frustration.

Because fury and frustration requires energy.

Then why feel shame opposed to nothing?

Re: For black CEOs in Silicon Valley, humiliation is a part of doing business

#643
post #620

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Acting on racial stereotypes (e.g. by treating someone as the superior or subordinate because of racially based assumptions) is indeed racist. It means your behaviour is informed by racial profiling of an individual. It means that you're not treating someone as an individual, but rather based on membership of a racial group he happens to be born in, which has statistical characteristics (e.g. lower chance of being a…

Your reply is conflating a few things. 1. We make judgements on “group membership” all the time, and to the extent they’re correlated to the outcome (i.e. true ) that’s not wrong or -ist . Example would be, do you avoid stepping in front of a car because you infer that the car might run you over, or do you just take your chances and hope that this individual car will stop. Ok, contrived example. How about this: peopl…

If group membership is basde on race, it's racism. If it is based on religion, e.g. judaism, it is anti-semitism. If it is based on sex, it is sexism.

If it is based on ones favorite sports team, it is just stupid.

Re: For black CEOs in Silicon Valley, humiliation is a part of doing business

#644
post #453

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Man, I feel you, I have worked in the valley for 10 years and am yet to work closely with a black developer. I have felt the loneliness at times - I seem to oscillate between all white teams and teams with many Asians (I am Indian). When you are a minority in a group, I think you tend to overthink things, feel very judged, and may be put in to an uncomfortable position to speak for your community. It can be weird and…

> When you are a minority in a group, I think you tend to overthink things, feel very judged, and may be put in to an uncomfortable position to speak for your community. why do you feel judged?

This is just part of it, but may give an idea.

The majority of people of African decent alive today have either lived through, or have parents/grand-parents that lived through the civil-rights movements(US)/decolonisation(Africa).

Some have lived without the right to speak their native language, to go to the school of their choosing, to vote, or had to give up their seat to a white person if the bus was getting full, considered second class citizen in their own land. So they either experienced it, and/or heard stories of how only the color of their skin stripped them of what we would consider basic rights, and the pain it caused people they know and love. Some (until 1990) have been born a crime[0] for being "mixed race".

You may think it's history but for many alive today it's their life story. And what I mentioned is but a small part of it, and I'm only talking about people of African decent. Had she lived 3 more years, Rosa Parks would have been able to see Barack Obama becoming president. And today, some get gentle[1] reminders[2] that they don't belong here[3], or just get threatened[4].

[0] https://youtu.be/WHKOJgUDRDM?t=86

[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mLXh85Nc1Bk

[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RQKx315yPtk

[3] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jEAHBl7OWBY

[4] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7d25HYk9Oms

Re: For black CEOs in Silicon Valley, humiliation is a part of doing business

#645

Earlier quoted context omitted.

50% of the US has below 100 IQ. There is literally nothing you can do if some people can’t understand the meaning that “Black Lives Matter” doesn’t mean “Only Black Lives Matter”. I think it’s a small but loud percentage of the people believe this.

More than a response this seems a rhetorical fallacy: "If they don't agree with me they're stupid". Maybe some of these people want to resolve racism but disliske the BLM methods? Are they stupid?

There’s nothing to disagree with. It’s been explained that “Black Lives Matter” doesn’t mean “Only Black Lives Matter” ad nauseum. If you still choose to say “All Lives Matter” then you’re being purposefully stupid. And that’s well explained by the fact that there are 150 million people with below average intelligence in the US. Of those 150M, there tens of millions that are one standard deviation lower than average. This explains the overreaction to the name.

Re: For black CEOs in Silicon Valley, humiliation is a part of doing business

#646

I thought this was a great article. One of the most interesting things to me was how the embarrassment/defensiveness of the white people involved was one of the biggest blocks to the black CEOs in their advancement, e.g. the VCs who "just wanted to get the hell out of there" after mistaking a white subordinate for the CEO. I've recently been reading/watching some videos and writings by Robin Diangelo on systemic raci…

I’ve not gone over the background content you have. Why is a simple but sincere apology not enough? Why do I have to make myself feel like a horrible person for this subconscious faux pas? Yes it’s an embarrassing. But to me, it’s like when meeting someone and you reach to shake their hand using your right hand out of habit but you don’t realize their right hand is full thus creating a awkward handshake interaction (…

Nobosy wants to be branded a racist despite how minor the faux pas may be. The correct attitude is to just apologize and move onto networking. Instead, these VCs are assuming that their mistake is going to anger the black man and that they need to get out of there before it turns ugly. A better understanding of how these mistakes are made would allow someone to realize that it's just better to acknowledge the mistake and work towards not doing it again. I think in this case, the problem and symptom are reversed. The subconscious racism of the VCs caused the black CEO to miss out on vital networking opportunities. It seems like that guy turned out ok but what if that was a critical time for him when that meeting could been the last shot at getting some investors before his company went bankrupt? Simply ignoring the issue and trying to get out of it was more harmful than just acknowledging it and moving past it.

Re: For black CEOs in Silicon Valley, humiliation is a part of doing business

#647
post #504

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>It is humiliating This is a common theme in a number of stories in this thread that I don't understand. How and why does being a victim of racism translate into shame? When I am subject to injustice, my emotional reaction has always been fury and frustration.

I imagine the feeling of humiliation is a normal human reaction, no matter if the cause is racism, domestic abuse, rape or what have you. The first few times it happens you might get angry, but when it's the 100th time you'll instead feel tired, sad and humiliated.

I understand sad and tired, but still not humiliation/shame. Is it because the recipient is warn down starting to internalize the narrative of the aggressor?

Re: For black CEOs in Silicon Valley, humiliation is a part of doing business

#648
post #525
post #499

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The very fact they find it necessary to use a different word to describe themselves, "expats", than what they call foreigners who live in their countries, "immigrants", shows that they do not at all consider themselves to be in any way similar. I've lived as part of a minority in other countries for half of my life. I try as much as I can to blend in, not because I think they are superior, but because I want to learn…

> The very fact they find it necessary to use a different word to describe themselves, "expats", than what they call foreigners who live in their countries, "immigrants", shows that they do not at all consider themselves to be in any way similar. I was taught these are two words for different concepts. An immigrant expects to take permanent residence in a foreign country, an expatriate – temporarily. The former doing…

> I do not have any sympathy for immigrants refusing to integrate?

what do you mean by integrate? are immigrants allowed to speak their native tongue, dress differently or act differently?

does Integration to you mean the complete erasure of their past identities? because that what the German in the pub seems to think.

Re: For black CEOs in Silicon Valley, humiliation is a part of doing business

#649

Earlier quoted context omitted.

He also chose the word "kafkatrap", a word coined by a notorious racist.

Using a kafkatrap against an opponent you can't beat in debate when they have just pointed out the tactic is probably ill advised; perhaps try something else; Ad hominem or motte and bailey for example.

"Kafkatrap" is a meaningless term, beyond "stop calling me a racist just for saying racist things".

Acting like it's an accepted logical fallacy is ridiculous. It's a term ESR made up because people kept rightly calling him a sexist and racist and he didn't like it and threw a tantrum.

Re: For black CEOs in Silicon Valley, humiliation is a part of doing business

#650
post #489
post #434

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You are being downvoted because this is a soft form of victim blaming [1]. As tone and context are difficult to transmit in such a short reply, it might be a good idea to phrase things in a more empathetic way in the future. And for the record, no, no this isn't because of how they dress. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Victim_blaming

I disagree with the premise of “victim blaming”. If we can't look at all sides of an issue for fear of being publicly shamed for going against a narrative, we'll end up with wrong conclusions a lot of the time. I did acknowledge racism could also play a part, but I don't see how we are supposed to be able to accept that one can read the minds of those that affront him. I also don't give a damn about the “monkey no li…

I wish you would put as much effort into listening and understanding other people's experiences as you do trying to find excuses for racism.
Post reply on HN