GitHub wil change default branch name from 'master' to 'main'
1–10 of 94 posts
Re: GitHub wil change default branch name from 'master' to 'main'
#2Re: GitHub wil change default branch name from 'master' to 'main'
#3This will just add yet another inconsistency to confuse newbies as they transition from using github directly to plain git cli... The more cynical side of me would think that may even be intentional.
Re: GitHub wil change default branch name from 'master' to 'main'
#4Re: GitHub wil change default branch name from 'master' to 'main'
#5Like I know some projects set their default branch as develop.
Also the set upstream command, that let's you have a local branch name different from remote, right?
Re: GitHub wil change default branch name from 'master' to 'main'
#6Re: GitHub wil change default branch name from 'master' to 'main'
#7Let's do this industry wide and never talk about it again.
Re: GitHub wil change default branch name from 'master' to 'main'
#8(I know bitkeeper used master/slave terminology for repositories; that is completely irrelevant to git).
Re: GitHub wil change default branch name from 'master' to 'main'
#9Re: GitHub wil change default branch name from 'master' to 'main'
#10Even existing projects??? No, that's not going to break tons of stuff and tooling built and running on production around "master" /s
Because the link here is just saying "that's a good idea and we're working on it" in response to someone asking about changing the default branch name.
Like default sounds like new project creation time.