The Violin Thief (2016)
washingtonpost.com
The Violin Thief (2016)
1–5 of 5 posts
Re: The Violin Thief (2016)
#2It's frustrating how the authors of this article drop bits and pieces of the story only to interrupt themselves. I get they're trying to provide "the bigger picture" or broader context or asking those "big questions" but it would work a lot better if they just told the damn story first.
Re: The Violin Thief (2016)
#3For those not wanting to subsidize Bezos: http://archive.is/TDOkH
Re: The Violin Thief (2016)
#4Must have been devastating for Maestro Totenberg.
Phil Johnson's crime was so pointless. He couldn't sell it or use it in a big enough gig. It probably was counter-productive for his career, since he had to cut ties with people in order to conceal the past, while connection is a huge part in world of classical music.
In the end, he died a mediocre player, known not for his playing but his crime.
A more concise version of the story: https://www.violinist.com/blog/laurie/20158/16968/
Re: The Violin Thief (2016)
#5Must have been devastating for Maestro Totenberg. Phil Johnson's crime was so pointless. He couldn't sell it or use it in a big enough gig. It probably was counter-productive for his career, since he had to cut ties with people in order to conceal the past, while connection is a huge part in world of classical music. In the end, he died a mediocre player, known not for his playing but his crime. A more concise versio…
I knew Philip in the 80s as he and I traveled in overlapping circles. I heard him play several times. He was far, far more than a mediocre player. He absolutely could have been a professional orchestra player had he wanted to--and if he had been able to control the abrasive bits of his personality. But nobody who heard him in those days would ever have called him 'mediocre.'
In a certain way, that adds to the tragedy of the whole sordid affair.