Live data from Hacker News

Google adds experimental setting to hide full URLs in Chrome 85 address bar

androidpolice.com

161–170 of 733 posts

Re: Google adds experimental setting to hide full URLs in Chrome 85 address bar

#161
post #94

Another phrase I live by: "the road to Hell is paved with good intentions." There will be some VP of Product or Engineering buried deep in the bureaucracy who is pushing this, deciding with no evidence (or, worse, lots of evidence to the contrary; believe me this happens) that it is the "users who are wrong" [1]. It now takes something like 4 taps to get to the point where I can correct or otherwise edit the URL in m…

> I'm tired of this anti-Web and anti-accessibility SJW nonsense to the point that yeah, I'm ready to ditch Chrome.

It's funny what the final piece of straw is that breaks peoples' metaphorical camels' backs.

Still, better it breaks and people make the move to greener pastures — hopefully Firefox rather than Chrome-with-even-more-questionable-ethics … I don't remember the name, something like Courageous or Fearless or something like that.

(Poor camels, though)

Re: Google adds experimental setting to hide full URLs in Chrome 85 address bar

#163
post #102
post #94

Another phrase I live by: "the road to Hell is paved with good intentions." There will be some VP of Product or Engineering buried deep in the bureaucracy who is pushing this, deciding with no evidence (or, worse, lots of evidence to the contrary; believe me this happens) that it is the "users who are wrong" [1]. It now takes something like 4 taps to get to the point where I can correct or otherwise edit the URL in m…

Insightful, but I am confused by the final paragraph: > I'm tired of this anti-Web and anti-accessibility SJW nonsense “SJW” must have a meaning I’m not familiar with, because Social Justice Warriors would be pro-accessibility, not anti.

[deleted]

Re: Google adds experimental setting to hide full URLs in Chrome 85 address bar

#164

Isn't this a good example of "feature creep"? I dont see any reason why it makes a browser more useful when the URL is partially hidden. It reminds me of a company which developed a product which was more or less done. So the SWE manager and the product manager made up new (pretty useless) features just to tell their bosses the devs are busy and the team must stay intact.

It makes their serving of AMP less transparent, which is a good thing for them. I guess.

This is the only economically rational explanation I can think of. Unless it ties into other user-abusive projects they have planned.

Re: Google adds experimental setting to hide full URLs in Chrome 85 address bar

#165

I'd personally prefer if ot wasn't hidden but after first hamd experiencing non tech savvy family members trying to decipher the query part and some accusing someone of trying to hack them I'm for the change. The whole query string philosophy is such an outdated hack. Today it's just thousands of tracking qieries. What I hate is how poorly they worded when websites use http instead of https. It says "connection not s…

If you dumb down users, they become dumber.

Re: Google adds experimental setting to hide full URLs in Chrome 85 address bar

#166
Firefox mobile syncs beautifully with desktop, and they have a standalone password manager app that syncs with your browser's password manager, maybe you'll find it useful.

There's also an accessibility setting to always force zoomability, even when the site disables it.

Re: Google adds experimental setting to hide full URLs in Chrome 85 address bar

#167
post #48

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think they're already trying to force that at the network level instead of the browser level using signed exchanges. https://developers.google.com/web/updates/2018/11/signed-exc...

Ffs. I’m going back to gopher at some point.

Or just switch to Firefox...

Re: Google adds experimental setting to hide full URLs in Chrome 85 address bar

#168
post #94

Another phrase I live by: "the road to Hell is paved with good intentions." There will be some VP of Product or Engineering buried deep in the bureaucracy who is pushing this, deciding with no evidence (or, worse, lots of evidence to the contrary; believe me this happens) that it is the "users who are wrong" [1]. It now takes something like 4 taps to get to the point where I can correct or otherwise edit the URL in m…

>SJW nonsense

Uh, what? It’s changing the UI to hide parts of the URL.

Look, I’d prefer it the other way too, but we have to choose the right words. The thought process shouldn’t be “I’m mad, what else makes me really mad like this? Oh yeah social justice workers. This UI change is therefore like social justice work.”

Re: Google adds experimental setting to hide full URLs in Chrome 85 address bar

#170
post #97

I actually don't mind this for the gen pop. For them, showing the URL is a bit like showing the path to the current process in the title bar. As a dev, hiding the HTTPS prefix is already irritating especially when copying the URL. If you copy the whole URL, you're fine. If you manually select part of it, starting with the domain, the prefix doesn't copy. I expect this upcoming change will exacerbate this kind of prob…

I see absolutely no benefit whatsoever for the general population. Dumbing things down for people does not make technology easier, it makes people dumber.

If your goal is to make people dumb and compliant, this is a great idea. Of course we know that's what Google's goal is, because that's what keeps the money flowing.

Post reply on HN