Earlier quoted context omitted.
The political system doesn't work like this either. All governments and political bodies are capable of dealing with multiple issues simultaneously. As far as I'm aware, none will deny you your rights or restitution just because "hey look, some people who look like you have done bad things, too."
> All governments and political bodies are capable of dealing with multiple issues simultaneously. If that were true there would be equally prominent protests and proposed legislation on both issues simultaneously. > As far as I'm aware, none will deny you your rights or restitution just because "hey look you've done bad things, too." You're talking about the legal system again.
The American Press Is Destroying Itself
341–350 of 618 posts
Re: The American Press Is Destroying Itself
#342Earlier quoted context omitted.
I mean it's not like taibbi is speaking up for child molesters Unlike, say, the NY Times https://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/06/opinion/pedophilia-a-diso...
Your characterization of the linked article could not be more wrong. They write about acknowledging the disorder of sexual attraction to prepubescents (=pedophilia) to prevent child abuse. Last sentence: > Acknowledging that pedophiles have a mental disorder, and removing the obstacles to their coming forward and seeking help, is not only the right thing to do, but it would also advance efforts to protect children fr…
Re: The American Press Is Destroying Itself
#343Earlier quoted context omitted.
This viewpoint makes zero sense to me: - protesting starts - some protestors get violent - President says "let's use the military to end violence" And you come away with "our president literally said to use violence against protestors protesting bigotry" . What?
Your president literally ordered a military attack on peaceful citizens for a photo-op.
Military officials are condemning this - why is this up for debate? (hint, its not.)
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/national-guard-troops-deploy... https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/02/us/politics/military-nati... https://www.marketwatch.com/story/trump-threatens-to-mobiliz...
Re: The American Press Is Destroying Itself
#344Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think the problem is deeper than just the press. These identity flame wars are sponsored by almost all big (non-news) corporations. The reason is clear. While there is distraction, the real issues are unaddressed and they can keep putting their hands in your pocket when you aren't looking. Also, excessive pseudo-socialism is a great tool to drive down wages and have the whole world compete against each other. Locus…
What is "excessive pseudo socialism" and "Locust capitalism?" Also, I see your account was created an hour ago.
Socialism is meant to be a counter-force to unrestricted capitalism. America lacks this counter-force. Instead, America has a (so called) Left that is afraid of being branded "socialist". Because they cannot embrace genuine socialist policies for fear of upsetting their very wealthy and powerful patrons, they are trying to win votes by appealing to people's pathological tendency to form rival tribal groups. This is quite the irony, considering that socialism's original rallying cry was the (inherently trans-tribal, trans-national)"Workers of the World, UNITE".
True socialism looks for opportunity in horizontal social partitions (the social classes), whereas nationalism looks for opportunity in vertical social partitions (ethno-linguistic and religious segregations). This is why nationalism is the capitalist class's preferred evil -- it directs the dissatisfaction and anger of the lower classes against each other, away from the wealthy. Both the American Left and American Right are focusing on the vertical (tribal) partitions -- it's just that the Left is very polite and composed about it.
This is what (I believe) the GP tried to imply with the term "pseudo socialism".
Re: The American Press Is Destroying Itself
#345On a side note, does anyone subscribe to any good news/information site? I would like to subscribe to something good and know I'm supporting it.
Re: The American Press Is Destroying Itself
#346Earlier quoted context omitted.
> The protests are about systematic discrimination of black people. No one questioned that black people can also be perpetrators - it's just irrelevant to the topic at hand. And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye? There is something to be said for asking someone to start by getting their own house in order.
I'm not sure I understand your comment correctly. Are you saying that black communities should be reasonably crime-free before they can expect institutions not to systematically discriminate them and enact retributionless, extralegal violence upon them?
Re: The American Press Is Destroying Itself
#347Earlier quoted context omitted.
Do you feel like there are many parallels between being a Jew in 1939 Germany and being a black person in 2020 USA?
That's not how analogies work, so this is completely missing the point. For example, if you say the Colosseum is to Rome what a roller coaster is to an amusement part, you are not saying that the Colosseum is similar to a roller coaster. No, what you're comparing is the Colosseum's relationship to Rome and the rollercoaster's relationship to the amusement park. xg15's analogy isn't meant to equate Black people in Ame…
The article discussed here specifically builds a significant part of its argument on the way violence inside black communities is silenced because it does not fit the current narrative. The article does not talk about police brutality itself, but about the way reality is bent and picked to fit a minority viewpoint.
Re: The American Press Is Destroying Itself
#348Earlier quoted context omitted.
> All governments and political bodies are capable of dealing with multiple issues simultaneously. If that were true there would be equally prominent protests and proposed legislation on both issues simultaneously. > As far as I'm aware, none will deny you your rights or restitution just because "hey look you've done bad things, too." You're talking about the legal system again.
In what way does being capable of considering multiple issues simultaneously require protest for all of these issues, or equal prominence for all of these issues? I have no idea what point you're trying to make, really.
Because that's what considering means. It takes more than just declaring that something is under consideration while not really paying attention to it or doing anything about it.
We don't actually consider all issues at once equally. That's why it makes sense to question their relative importance.
Re: The American Press Is Destroying Itself
#349I pay $5/month to Taibbi to get email updates. This one had a note that it could be shared.
Press is now just a business to make money and to occasionally push agendas on the owners’ wishes.