> Trump’s posts included the racially charged phrase “when the looting starts, the shooting starts” How is that racially charged?
Facebook fires employee for publicly scolding a colleague
11–20 of 368 posts
Re: Facebook fires employee for publicly scolding a colleague
#12Dear Mark Zuckerberg, Please use the power you have over the facebook platform, including that overseas in countries in Africa, and India to change the outcome of the US election this year so Trump loses. Then after the other countries too. With great power comes great responsibility, Zuck.
Re: Facebook fires employee for publicly scolding a colleague
#13> Trump’s posts included the racially charged phrase “when the looting starts, the shooting starts” How is that racially charged?
Re: Facebook fires employee for publicly scolding a colleague
#14Dear Mark Zuckerberg, Please use the power you have over the facebook platform, including that overseas in countries in Africa, and India to change the outcome of the US election this year so Trump loses. Then after the other countries too. With great power comes great responsibility, Zuck.
Do you really think Zuck reads HackerNews comments?
Re: Facebook fires employee for publicly scolding a colleague
#15> Trump’s posts included the racially charged phrase “when the looting starts, the shooting starts” How is that racially charged?
The Chief got the phrase from the guy who used firehoses and dogs against children during the Birmingham, AL protests.
Re: Facebook fires employee for publicly scolding a colleague
#16I think a key phrase here is "he was dismissed for publicly challenging a colleague’s silence". In other words, he publicly harassed a colleague who (for what could be any number of perfectly valid reasons) preferred not to publicly state their beliefs. That would seem to me to be an eminently reasonable reason to fire someone. If you go around publicly harassing your colleagues to publicly state their political opin…
The fired employee Tweeted today:
>In the interest of transparency, I was let go for calling out an employee’s inaction here on Twitter. I stand by what I said. They didn’t give me the chance to quit [0]
He then specifically cited [1] the Tweet in question that was the cause:
>I asked @Vjeux to follow @reactjs's lead and add a statement of support to Recoil's docs and he privately refused, claiming open source shouldn't be political.
>Intentionally not making a statement is already political. Consider that next time you think of Recoil. [2]
This is specifically targeting an individual front-end engineer at FB, which in my own estimation crosses the line from criticism of executives or general policy, to specifically trying to instigate public outrage against a co-worker. If such actions were directed at me, I would definitely consider it as contributing to a hostile work environment. It all strikes me as a modern-day example of "Havel's greengrocer" [3].
[0] https://twitter.com/aweary/status/1271522288752455680
[1] https://twitter.com/aweary/status/1271531477209976832
[2] https://twitter.com/aweary/status/1267895488205869057
[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Power_of_the_Powerless#Hav...
Re: Facebook fires employee for publicly scolding a colleague
#17Re: Facebook fires employee for publicly scolding a colleague
#18There isn't a lot of information, for what it's worth I would be interested in how "public" his confrontation was, depending on that this could be more of a knee-jerk "this person is yikes" vs. sinister "don't stray from the party line"
Re: Facebook fires employee for publicly scolding a colleague
#19Re: Facebook fires employee for publicly scolding a colleague
#20Dear Mark Zuckerberg, Please use the power you have over the facebook platform, including that overseas in countries in Africa, and India to change the outcome of the US election this year so Trump loses. Then after the other countries too. With great power comes great responsibility, Zuck.