Live data from Hacker News

Phpfog "Down for maintenance"

phpfogsucks.com

21–30 of 125 posts

Re: Phpfog "Down for maintenance"

#21
post #7

What a dick move. Did these idiots actually publish their names in relation to this? Coming from "security experts" this is the most unprofessional thing I've ever seen.

Please don't put these guys in the same basket as security experts. They are by no means experts, from the looks of it they are just doing it for the lulz at this point...

Re: Phpfog "Down for maintenance"

#23
post #7

What a dick move. Did these idiots actually publish their names in relation to this? Coming from "security experts" this is the most unprofessional thing I've ever seen.

A mirror of the code dump (referred to in a tweet linked in this discussion) is hosted on a 16 webdev from Australia... Atleast they were kind enough to remove all API keys and passwords from the code dump.

Dumps are now hosted on Amazon S3 ...

Re: Phpfog "Down for maintenance"

#24
post #2

It didn't take long for someone to use that vulnerability to open up the entire server. People are posting from the @phpfog Twitter account and someone posted the entire codebase: http://twitter.com/#!/communistcake/status/49340298677075968 Edit: Actually, the links in that message appear to just be mirrors of the links at the bottom of the article. Edit 2: Links in that last status are now dead. Wonder if the young…

They put them up on Amazon S3, I am guessing they didn't want to pay for the hosting fees.

Re: Phpfog "Down for maintenance"

#26
post #4

This is a pretty good lesson: when you have that little niggling feeling in the back of your head about something security-related, take care of it. Otherwise, someone WILL exploit it. Seems like they were using the load balancer as a way to obfuscate the existence of the individual EC2 instances. Also, that has gotta be really expensive to have an EC2 instance-per-customer.

I don't think they are obfuscating it. If I remember correctly, their pricing page made perfectly clear that they used dedicated EC2 instances.

Just for the record - the cheapest EC2 instance type is t1.micro, and amounts to ~15 USD/month (+EBS and IP costs). I didn't see their business plan so I can't tell what is their big picture about that :-)

Re: Phpfog "Down for maintenance"

#27
post #7

What a dick move. Did these idiots actually publish their names in relation to this? Coming from "security experts" this is the most unprofessional thing I've ever seen.

Astonishingly classless and mean-spirited. Especially this part:

"feel free to harass the staff in their support forums..."

The founder and CEO of PHP Fog is extremely active in their support forum. He provides lightning fast responses, and is really proactive at trying to help.

I mentioned that my app was undergoing a traffic spike, and he personally on his own initiative ran some tests to help me understand how to deal with the load.

I really feel for Lucas and the team at PHP Fog. They are awesome people, so they'll get through this. But dang, it's gotta be miserable.

Re: Phpfog "Down for maintenance"

#29
post #4

This is a pretty good lesson: when you have that little niggling feeling in the back of your head about something security-related, take care of it. Otherwise, someone WILL exploit it. Seems like they were using the load balancer as a way to obfuscate the existence of the individual EC2 instances. Also, that has gotta be really expensive to have an EC2 instance-per-customer.

I don't think they are obfuscating it. If I remember correctly, their pricing page made perfectly clear that they used dedicated EC2 instances. Just for the record - the cheapest EC2 instance type is t1.micro, and amounts to ~15 USD/month (+EBS and IP costs). I didn't see their business plan so I can't tell what is their big picture about that :-)

Oh that's not bad at all, maybe they added that since the last time I looked or maybe I just missed it.
Post reply on HN