Live data from Hacker News

Twitter suspended Indian dairy giant Amul for call to boycott Chinese goods

thestateindia.com

31–40 of 42 posts

Re: Twitter suspended Indian dairy giant Amul for call to boycott Chinese goods

#31

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Maybe it’s good, maybe it’s bad. I think they are a private company with free speech, and people should just not use their products if they don’t like it.

Yes, I think if people want squares then it's time to think about funding. And is broadband now the road to this public square? If so, is there a problem that all these roads are basically toll roads owned by mega-corps?

Telephones have always been operated by for-profit institutions in the U.S. I much prefer at least one layer of indirection between my computer and the NSA. You put the government in charge of the internet and you'll get censorship.

I'm perfectly fine with the innovation coming from SpaceX and mobile operators with 5G to solve these complex problems. It works well by and large.

As for a publicly funded Twitter, meh, would you use it? Have you used government software? Rarely is it designed and run well.

Re: Twitter suspended Indian dairy giant Amul for call to boycott Chinese goods

#32
post #16
post #5

Seems to be a mistake, possibly automated: >On this post, Twitter messaged that your account is temporarily blocked. You are seeing this message because some unusual activity has occurred from this account.

Wow. Building and operating a massive unaccountable automated system to deboost and/or silence undesirable speech is now OK because 'it was a mistake'. Edit. At what point are the users and/or the public at large owed a detailed postmortem for those 'mistakes'?

It seems to be related to hack detection of the account:

https://scroll.in/latest/964035/amuls-twitter-account-blocke...

Re: Twitter suspended Indian dairy giant Amul for call to boycott Chinese goods

#34
post #19

Up until now, many have been cheering Twitter bans and attacking FB for not doing the same since it aligned with their political views. This kind of behavior by tech giants is bad, regardless if you agree or not with who they are suspending or banning.

No, the bad thing is that they’re tech giants in the first place. If they weren’t so big, they wouldn’t have so much power, and thus there wouldn’t be a problem at all.

Re: Twitter suspended Indian dairy giant Amul for call to boycott Chinese goods

#35
post #19

Up until now, many have been cheering Twitter bans and attacking FB for not doing the same since it aligned with their political views. This kind of behavior by tech giants is bad, regardless if you agree or not with who they are suspending or banning.

Maybe it’s good, maybe it’s bad. I think they are a private company with free speech, and people should just not use their products if they don’t like it.

Remember when everyone was all for net neutrality? This is no different IMO.

Re: Twitter suspended Indian dairy giant Amul for call to boycott Chinese goods

#36
post #25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Maybe it’s good, maybe it’s bad. I think they are a private company with free speech, and people should just not use their products if they don’t like it.

Would you support changing laws to allow Twitter to ban black people from their platform?

Straw horse argument.

And as a private business I’m pretty sure they can ban anyone they want for any reason.

Re: Twitter suspended Indian dairy giant Amul for call to boycott Chinese goods

#37
I love all recent moves done by social media giants and I hope that they will continue along this path - it's just boring when only selected type of content and opinion is allowed. Some people will be able to perceive that published content is complaisant, inhonest artificial facade and will look around for other communication solutions.

Re: Twitter suspended Indian dairy giant Amul for call to boycott Chinese goods

#39
post #19

Up until now, many have been cheering Twitter bans and attacking FB for not doing the same since it aligned with their political views. This kind of behavior by tech giants is bad, regardless if you agree or not with who they are suspending or banning.

No, it is an inconsistency in the application of the rules.

What is the rationale from Twitter? That wanting reduced dependence on trade with an Authoritarian dictatorship is bad? That the caricature of China as a dragon is offensive? What?

Re: Twitter suspended Indian dairy giant Amul for call to boycott Chinese goods

#40

"Let's suspend everything that seems to be offensive but if public starts to make a big deal out of it, just say there was a bug with our automated software for filtering content. It's not like anyone will ever look at our code"

It would be interesting to see a cataloging of censorship actions by social/media companies, etc. alongside the response. Ie Company x did y, z number of times, and blamed a bug w times versus deliberative actions q times.
Post reply on HN