There's a reason tear gas is prohibited in warfare by the Geneva Protocol of 1925 right up there with the other chemical weapons. I got an extremely diluted dose of it while in my apartment with a window cracked, and I had to immediately close the window and leave to another room. I can't believe they're subjecting their own domestic population with chemical weapons.
Tear Gas Is Way More Dangerous Than Police Let On - Especially During COVID
61–70 of 142 posts
Re: Tear Gas Is Way More Dangerous Than Police Let On - Especially During COVID
#62Earlier quoted context omitted.
Except you're still killing grandma which is just as bad as police brutality.
Is the argument, then, that protestors should wait until police brutality results in another death when it is more convenient to protest?
Re: Tear Gas Is Way More Dangerous Than Police Let On - Especially During COVID
#63My girlfriend worked in eye care for years, she's seen a lot of pretty bad injuries over the years one of the worst stories though was a teenage girl who was pepper sprayed in the face at close range. It basically disintegrated her eye balls. One of them was nearly completely gone and the other one had about 30% of its tissue remaining. She permanently lost her vision and had to undergo multiple surgeries and rehabil…
any idea why this happened to her in particular. Was there anything special about this pepper spray.
Re: Tear Gas Is Way More Dangerous Than Police Let On - Especially During COVID
#64> Especially During COVID Public gatherings are supposedly extremely dangerous right now. The fact that everyone is suddenly all for mass protests suggests we got the severity of Coronavirus wrong and people are using this as a convenient out for backing off shelter in place orders without losing face. In February the "Philly had a parade, St Louis Stayed home" article was being shared by here and everywhere else. Fr…
[0] https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8391325/Iran-countr...
Re: Tear Gas Is Way More Dangerous Than Police Let On - Especially During COVID
#65Earlier quoted context omitted.
>Police Brutality isn't a new problem. They should have waited until covid-19 was gone. This wouldn't be happening in a world with 4% unemployment. But 20 million Americans are now out of work, stuck at home, and pissed off. Not to mention without the usual distractions of sports or live entertainment. When the bread and circuses break down, this is the result.
This is the first time I’ve heard this obvious point. There are riots now because people just don’t have the energy left to protest while surviving in hyper capitalism. They’ve got plenty of entertainment at home. This is bout energy and time. Employment supresses protest because it takes time and saps energy.
Re: Tear Gas Is Way More Dangerous Than Police Let On - Especially During COVID
#66Earlier quoted context omitted.
The reason for that is not necessarily its direct harm though, but to avoid combating parties one-upping each other with chemical warfare, e.g starting with teargas and escalating to sarine gas or whatever. This post explains it better: https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/gwtj89/the_c...
> but to avoid combating parties one-upping each other with chemical warfare That policy makes sense and seems applicable to protests to prevent peaceful protests from escalating and becoming violent.
The logic around chemical weapons in the Geneva conventions was specific to escalation around chemical weapons. It wasn't a fully general argument about the use of force. Any force used by police could cause escalation, but we do allow the police to use force.
Re: Tear Gas Is Way More Dangerous Than Police Let On - Especially During COVID
#67Earlier quoted context omitted.
>Police Brutality isn't a new problem. They should have waited until covid-19 was gone. This wouldn't be happening in a world with 4% unemployment. But 20 million Americans are now out of work, stuck at home, and pissed off. Not to mention without the usual distractions of sports or live entertainment. When the bread and circuses break down, this is the result.
This is a great way of phrasing something I've tried saying several times but it always fell flat.
ie there's not an implication that these riots were avoidable by not having lockdowns
Re: Tear Gas Is Way More Dangerous Than Police Let On - Especially During COVID
#68Every full face respirator you see riot (-causing) police wearing or holding has a P100 particulate filter and could have instead been used by a nurse, EMT, or an at-risk person for protection from COVID-19. And to have so many ready to go, the cops were likely just sitting on their stockpiles throughout that period of dire PPE shortage. If that PPE had been used for healthcare as it should have, the cops would have…
Re: Tear Gas Is Way More Dangerous Than Police Let On - Especially During COVID
#69Earlier quoted context omitted.
Is this peak HN? People are protesting outside at great risk to themselves because they secretly hated Coronavirus restrictions and want to party? What level of deranged unawareness would ever make you say that?
While I don't think it's a conspiracy, I am convinced that the civil unrest was directly tied to the lockdowns. Floyd's death is the acute cause for the protests, but we've had these protests before and they were much milder. Add mass unemployment, economic uncertainty, closed bars, closed parks, shelter-in-place orders, zero entertainment, no sports, etc., and you suddenly have an explosive situation.
Re: Tear Gas Is Way More Dangerous Than Police Let On - Especially During COVID
#70> Especially During COVID Public gatherings are supposedly extremely dangerous right now. The fact that everyone is suddenly all for mass protests suggests we got the severity of Coronavirus wrong and people are using this as a convenient out for backing off shelter in place orders without losing face. In February the "Philly had a parade, St Louis Stayed home" article was being shared by here and everywhere else. Fr…