US schools lay off hundreds of thousands
51–60 of 209 posts
Re: US schools lay off hundreds of thousands
#52Earlier quoted context omitted.
When you or your loved ones or your friends are devastated by the layoffs and shutdown. When you are hurting and frustrated by everything that’s going on. Just remember. It’s the Chinese government that did this.
Oh fuck off with this xenophobic bullshit.
Re: US schools lay off hundreds of thousands
#53Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Educational investments shouldn’t be dictated by transient economic conditions. Could someone not make the same argument about the national defense? Education is funded largely by local taxes, and local tax revenues are being gutted, so there isn't much that can be done here without nationalizing public education.
I don't think we should be opposed to nationalizing education. A common curriculum would help mobility when it comes to families moving across state lines. It would also ensure uniform funding and plentiful opportunities to poorer and rural schools.
Those who don't like this can still send their kids to private schools.
Re: US schools lay off hundreds of thousands
#54Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Educational investments shouldn’t be dictated by transient economic conditions. Could someone not make the same argument about the national defense? Education is funded largely by local taxes, and local tax revenues are being gutted, so there isn't much that can be done here without nationalizing public education.
>Could someone not make the same argument about the national defense? The US's definition of National Defense is actually playing world police for corporate profit. With that in mind it shows that they are superficially similar only.
Re: US schools lay off hundreds of thousands
#55You know who’s not laying off anyone? The military. Local funding of schools is ridiculous. Education benefits the whole nation. Educational investments shouldn’t be dictated by transient economic conditions.
> Educational investments shouldn’t be dictated by transient economic conditions. Could someone not make the same argument about the national defense? Education is funded largely by local taxes, and local tax revenues are being gutted, so there isn't much that can be done here without nationalizing public education.
> national defense
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_military_...
I'm not as against military spending as some people, but almost 800 billion dollars is too much
Re: US schools lay off hundreds of thousands
#56You know who’s not laying off anyone? The military. Local funding of schools is ridiculous. Education benefits the whole nation. Educational investments shouldn’t be dictated by transient economic conditions.
If anything, we want government spending to be inversely correlated with economic conditions, so it should go up during economic downturns.
Re: US schools lay off hundreds of thousands
#57Re: US schools lay off hundreds of thousands
#58What once required a high school diploma requires an undergraduate degree. What once required an undergraduate degree requires graduate school. Most of your time spend in school is learning skills that the labor market cares little for.
Not wholly convinced by his conclusion that entirely defunding education is the path forward, but it's a perspective I found very interesting!
Here's the interview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1hZylJp-pHo&t=495s
Re: US schools lay off hundreds of thousands
#59It's odd to me that there is this bizarre certainty on hacker news that within 20 years the most common occupation, truck driving, will be nearly entirely obsolete, yet in an era where almost all human knowledge is available online for free, the idea that the education apparatus will either stay the same or continue to grow is somehow a given.
> where almost all human knowledge is available online for free And it has been so for nearly 20 years and changed very little. MOOCs are a failure as people will not finish them. Online certificates carry no weight with employers even if people do. We have promising prototypes of self driving trucks. We don't have such models for education.
OLI before that had good prototypes too.
The low-quality junk came in scaling. Part of that had to do with culture and people (business people took over from academics). Part of that with economics (people didn't shop on quality). Part on difficulty training. Etc.
Re: US schools lay off hundreds of thousands
#60Earlier quoted context omitted.
This just places even more burden on teachers to do everything. This is like keeping the troops but removing the supply lines.
Except, the janitors and / or lunch servers can be hired within a couple weeks and don't require training. Teachers are harder to hire because they have expertise, unions, and have years of experience.
Schools are complex operations, made simple only by those who don't understand them.