Live data from Hacker News

SoftBank launches $100m minorities startup fund

reuters.com

91–100 of 111 posts

Re: SoftBank launches $100m minorities startup fund

#91

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Limiting initiatives like this based on skin color, implies that the reason for them needing help is their skin color. Systematic racism is very much real in the United States, putting minorities at a disadvantage exactly because of the color of their skin - socioeconomic background and upbringing aside. Affirmative action, and presumably this effort by SoftBank, is intended to address that.

As far as I can see, this doesn't exist in the tech world (any more). Most Fortune 500 companies go out of their way to hire minorities, even if they are less qualified. Colleges do the same. Minorities are not disadvantaged purely for their skin color in the tech world. They are disadvantaged because of their worse financial/education situation. And my point is that these traits that effect people in tech are not li…

Maybe in Utah or San Diego. In Silicon Valley, half the employees are foreign-born, many of which haven't been indoctrinated. So occasionally, a black developer there will end up at a different company than he otherwise would, and of course he'll spend a bit more time getting dressed in the morning.

For founders dealing with VC, it's a different equation, so your intuition about "the tech world" doesn't exactly apply. Still, I agree with you. There isn't some untapped vein of black and latino American founders that other VC's are currently missing out on.

Re: SoftBank launches $100m minorities startup fund

#94
post #73

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Aren't these the real reasons why people are disadvantaged? No, or at least, not exclusively. There's tons of social science research in which, for example, two identical fabricated resumes were submitted for a battery of jobs, differing only by, say, a headshot of a black vs. white person, or a stereotypically-African-American name vs. a stereotypically white (or not-obviously-race-signaling) one. In these studies…

I have a question, just because I don't know if there is data on this. I've seen a bunch of studies on things like "stereotypically-african-american-name" vs "stereotypically-white-name", which are good evidence as to why a good hiring process should remove personally-identifying details from resumes. Not just the name of the applicant, either -- school names and locations can also introduce unfair biases. Company na…

What even is a stereotypically-white-name? Anglo name?

Re: SoftBank launches $100m minorities startup fund

#96
post #80

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> No, or at least, not exclusively. But primarily, right? Bias plays a role, so everything else being equal, a black applicant will receive fewer callbacks than a white or asian one, but (and that's a big but) the primary issue is that usually not all other things are equal. The average black person comes from a different socioeconomic background than the average white or asian person, so they'll usually not have the…

> Yeah, sure, a black guy from a rich family that attended MIT will have a harder time finding funding than his white or asian friends from the same background ... but he'll have a much easier time than some white kid from a broken home. Even if your claims are supported by evidence, why is it a bad thing to want to correct that disparity? The fact that there also exist other disparities in the world doesn’t seem lik…

> Even if your claims are supported by evidence, why is it a bad thing to want to correct that disparity?

It's not "bad" as in "omg don't do that", it's just focusing on a less significant problem instead of the large problem, which it conveniently shifts focus from.

I don't think that it's intentional, but I'm absolutely sure that addressing the lacking social mobility in the US would benefit minorities much more than racism, because they are much, much more affected by it.

Re: SoftBank launches $100m minorities startup fund

#97
This is a good idea; it makes sense to test for opportunities to profit from racism and pick up high-value entrepreneurs of colour.

The HN title should be changed though, it says 'minorities' while the original article says 'people of colour'. I assumed it would be targeting Asians from the HN title.

Re: SoftBank launches $100m minorities startup fund

#98

I like it. Very clever. If there are founders out there who are capable but underserved sorely because they're not in the right social circles then this is a good attempt at capitalizing on that. I love watching the market in action. Wonder if it will pay off.

Isn’t YC this too? Anyone can apply. I don’t get the impression it’s about who you know.

Re: SoftBank launches $100m minorities startup fund

#99

Class is a problem, but the class issue isn't "poor Black kids from broken homes" (to quote some comments here) vs upper middle class FAANG employees and MIT grads. Being poor and uneducated is a barrier to being an employee in tech, but it's not the only barrier to getting funding. Anyone that can leetcode can get a job in tech. Raising requires a strong network, involves quite a lot of signaling and bias and gut fe…

A lot of investors aren't actually interested in profitable products. Companies get over funded to the point where it is impossible to make a return by simply offering a product.

Re: SoftBank launches $100m minorities startup fund

#100
This is a cute little gesture, but it is ultimately bound to fail.

The root cause of the problem of poverty for minorities, is far beyond the scope that this idea can even solve.

We effectively need a reset in our capitalistic system.

For far too long, we have used GDP as the measure of wealth of a country. But we now live in a world, where money essentially has no bounds to reality anymore. It is tied to nothing, but it is the driver of everything.

The Fed and other central banks, are used to print money out of thin air, and give it to banks, to lend out, or to buy back loans from corporations.

People blindly believe that this will not cause inflation, but instead, it drives up asset inflation, which drives up the cost of everything else. This is the hidden inflation, that takes money out of your pocket, and is beyond your control.

This is where the government needs to step in and put in policies to protect the people.

Instead of GDP, we need to measure QOL, or the Quality of Life.

This is the measure of how well the median person’s quality of life is, in terms of how much they earn, and how much their rent and mortgage is. As well as other factors like, access to modern basic necessities: electricity, shelter, clothing, healthcare, transportation, communication, and food.

No person, should be required to spend over 50% of their income on housing. There is just no money left over afterwards to pay for anything else. You will forever be, bound to a life of poverty and destitution, as well as your children.

Additionally, we need to remove housing as an investment vehicle. Instead of creating wealth for all, this has become the driver of massive inequality.

Housing needs to be for people to live in, and not for speculation. The government should mandate the building of more housing, to increase availability, and to drive down costs. And people should be able to afford and own their own homes. And maybe to kickstart a post-industrial society, the government should back the mortgage, where you just need to work a meaningful job in society, for 20 years, and the house is yours. The government will pick up the remaining tab on the house afterwards.

This will give you a home, and the security you need to be safe and whole. You can raise your family and your children, without the fear of poverty, or crime, or a lifetime servitude of debt.

And for things like food, the vegetables and fruits, can be grown in massive automated vertical farms. And one day, tended to by robots, for monitoring and harvesting. No more need for back breaking labor performed by humans. Let the robots do all the work. The software for it will be developed by programmers, and the fruits and vegetables will be monitored by using adaptive machine learning software.

These are bold challenges, and we need bold leaders to think beyond their myopic economic view of the world, where they only think of enriching themselves and their cronies, and actually do their job to govern, and to lead and guide the people.

Post reply on HN