Live data from Hacker News

Microsoft Defender SmartScreen is hurting independent developers

getimageview.net

231–240 of 243 posts

Re: Microsoft Defender SmartScreen is hurting independent developers

#231

Earlier quoted context omitted.

OTOH: On macOS, you pay $100/yr and you're set -- any apps you notarize will launch with a simple confirmation dialog. On Windows, you can spend hundreds of dollars on a security certificate and still get blocked by SmartScreen and/or antivirus software. I'm not aware of any situations where Apple has declined to offer a developer certificate to a developer, outside of situations where they are legally barred from do…

>> On Windows, you can spend hundreds of dollars on a security certificate and still get blocked by SmartScreen and/or antivirus software. You are wrong. As described in the OP if you buy EV certificate($70) [0] you are all set. >> I'm not aware of any situations where Apple has declined to offer a developer certificate I can see that. Still there are such cases. Monopoly on the approval process is bad anyway. Even i…

That’s an SSL certificate. Anyone who pays for that is dumb. Anyone that tries to use it for code signing is dumber.

Re: Microsoft Defender SmartScreen is hurting independent developers

#232
post #95

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sure, Bonzi Buddy might not be the best example, but you get his point. People just click through dialogs to close them without thinking about what they are clicking.

You don't get to handwave away a clear fallacy with "ok but you get the point". _My_ point is that the point is false, not that the example is bad. If Bonzi Buddy can just buy their way into your computer, then this does not save you. From anything. Because real malicious actors like Bonzi Buddy can just buy their way in!

A trojan that steals banking information is going to be able to afford a certificate, but they aren't going to buy one because they would have to identify themselves.

Re: Microsoft Defender SmartScreen is hurting independent developers

#233
post #95

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You don't get to handwave away a clear fallacy with "ok but you get the point". _My_ point is that the point is false, not that the example is bad. If Bonzi Buddy can just buy their way into your computer, then this does not save you. From anything. Because real malicious actors like Bonzi Buddy can just buy their way in!

A trojan that steals banking information is going to be able to afford a certificate, but they aren't going to buy one because they would have to identify themselves.

> they would have to identify themselves

False. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Identity_fraud

In order to understand this, you really need to start thinking like a criminal. "If I had money, power, maybe guns, and no conscience or care for anyone else, what could I get away with?"

Re: Microsoft Defender SmartScreen is hurting independent developers

#234

Earlier quoted context omitted.

OTOH: On macOS, you pay $100/yr and you're set -- any apps you notarize will launch with a simple confirmation dialog. On Windows, you can spend hundreds of dollars on a security certificate and still get blocked by SmartScreen and/or antivirus software. I'm not aware of any situations where Apple has declined to offer a developer certificate to a developer, outside of situations where they are legally barred from do…

>> On Windows, you can spend hundreds of dollars on a security certificate and still get blocked by SmartScreen and/or antivirus software. You are wrong. As described in the OP if you buy EV certificate($70) [0] you are all set. >> I'm not aware of any situations where Apple has declined to offer a developer certificate I can see that. Still there are such cases. Monopoly on the approval process is bad anyway. Even i…

> You are wrong. As described in the OP if you buy EV certificate($70) [0] you are all set.

That's an EV SSL certificate, not an EV code signing certificate, which costs significantly more and still doesn't prevent an application from being blocked by antivirus software.

Re: Microsoft Defender SmartScreen is hurting independent developers

#235
post #233

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A trojan that steals banking information is going to be able to afford a certificate, but they aren't going to buy one because they would have to identify themselves.

> they would have to identify themselves False. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Identity_fraud In order to understand this, you really need to start thinking like a criminal. "If I had money, power, maybe guns, and no conscience or care for anyone else, what could I get away with?"

You're imagining some mastermind criminal rather than some kid or for-hire hacker who finds an exploit kit and gets to work piecing together something malicious.

Re: Microsoft Defender SmartScreen is hurting independent developers

#236

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> but that SmartScreen window has looked like that for many, many years It changed a year or two ago. The "Run Anyways" button used to be on the main dialog. Now the user has to click the "More Info" button to see that option.

That particular dialog has been the same since Windows 10's launch, though it is "adaptive" in that as the reputation slowly builds it will show the Run Anyways button at something like "medium reputation".

Ahh, that explains it. I had a screenshot of the SmartScreen dialog on my download page. After releasing a new version last fall, I noticed the dialog changed to the hidden Run Anyways option. My error, apparently, was including the major version number in the setup file name. When that rolled, the reputation reset.

Re: Microsoft Defender SmartScreen is hurting independent developers

#237

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>> On Windows, you can spend hundreds of dollars on a security certificate and still get blocked by SmartScreen and/or antivirus software. You are wrong. As described in the OP if you buy EV certificate($70) [0] you are all set. >> I'm not aware of any situations where Apple has declined to offer a developer certificate I can see that. Still there are such cases. Monopoly on the approval process is bad anyway. Even i…

> You are wrong. As described in the OP if you buy EV certificate($70) [0] you are all set. That's an EV SSL certificate, not an EV code signing certificate, which costs significantly more and still doesn't prevent an application from being blocked by antivirus software.

"Extended Validation Code Signing Certificate. Signing code with one of these will automatically bypass SmartScreen."

Code signing certificate is indeed more expensive(i.e around $300). Still I would rather pay more than having a single provider(Apple)

Re: Microsoft Defender SmartScreen is hurting independent developers

#238

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>> On Windows, you can spend hundreds of dollars on a security certificate and still get blocked by SmartScreen and/or antivirus software. You are wrong. As described in the OP if you buy EV certificate($70) [0] you are all set. >> I'm not aware of any situations where Apple has declined to offer a developer certificate I can see that. Still there are such cases. Monopoly on the approval process is bad anyway. Even i…

That’s an SSL certificate. Anyone who pays for that is dumb. Anyone that tries to use it for code signing is dumber.

[deleted]

Re: Microsoft Defender SmartScreen is hurting independent developers

#239

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>> On Windows, you can spend hundreds of dollars on a security certificate and still get blocked by SmartScreen and/or antivirus software. You are wrong. As described in the OP if you buy EV certificate($70) [0] you are all set. >> I'm not aware of any situations where Apple has declined to offer a developer certificate I can see that. Still there are such cases. Monopoly on the approval process is bad anyway. Even i…

That’s an SSL certificate. Anyone who pays for that is dumb. Anyone that tries to use it for code signing is dumber.

[deleted]

Re: Microsoft Defender SmartScreen is hurting independent developers

#240

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>> On Windows, you can spend hundreds of dollars on a security certificate and still get blocked by SmartScreen and/or antivirus software. You are wrong. As described in the OP if you buy EV certificate($70) [0] you are all set. >> I'm not aware of any situations where Apple has declined to offer a developer certificate I can see that. Still there are such cases. Monopoly on the approval process is bad anyway. Even i…

That’s an SSL certificate. Anyone who pays for that is dumb. Anyone that tries to use it for code signing is dumber.

Sorry for the wrong link. Below is the correct one to an EV Code Signing Certificate offer. For the dumb people who can't find a better price it's just $300. Enjoy!

https://comodosslstore.com/code-signing/comodo-ev-code-signi...

Post reply on HN