Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Things I Didn't Know About Google (also: the worst VC decision ever)

jamesaltucher.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

1–10 of 22 posts

Re: Things I Didn't Know About Google (also: the worst VC decision ever)

#2

Post by dools »

"it was about how the jews control Google, Facebook, Wikipedia, etc. The funny thing about this particular site is that it had Google Ads all over it."

I actually thought about this the other day in the context of how important Facebook was during revolutionary activity in Arab nations and the action Facebook took to protect people's passwords and privacy during the civil unrest in Tunisia.

My first thought was that maybe that would take the wind out of the sails of the "Jewish Zionist World Conspiracy" types.

Then I realised that those types probably don't read. Or think. C'est la vie.

Re: Things I Didn't Know About Google (also: the worst VC decision ever)

#4

Post by paul »

False history.

The Applied Semantics software was not needed to "generate 99% of its revenues at IPO time". They owned the trademark "AdSense", but the actual software used by Google was written by Google. Also, the product known as AdSense (at that time) was just for content targetted ads, not the search ads which produce most of the profits, so his bit of trivia is actually double wrong.

Re: Things I Didn't Know About Google (also: the worst VC decision ever)

#5

Post by [deleted] »

paul wrote: post #4

False history. The Applied Semantics software was not needed to "generate 99% of its revenues at IPO time". They owned the trademark "AdSense", but the actual software used by Google was written by Google. Also, the product known as AdSense (at that time) was just for content targetted ads, not the search ads which produce most of the profits, so his bit of trivia is actually double wrong.

[deleted]

Re: Things I Didn't Know About Google (also: the worst VC decision ever)

#6

Post by diego »

That's like saying that not buying the winning lottery ticket was a bad decision. You did the best with the information you had at the time.

Drinking and driving is a bad decision. Putting all your eggs in one basket is a bad decision. Passing on a given investment opportunity is just everyday business for a VC.

Re: Things I Didn't Know About Google (also: the worst VC decision ever)

#7

Post by btilly »

Interesting trivia. One of the inspirations for Page Rank was undoubtably the Science Citation Index. Which was ultimately inspired by a 1945 article called As We May Think by Vanevar Bush.

HTML is inspired by the idea of hypertext, which was inspired by the idea of a memex machine, which was invented in a 1945 article called As We May Think by Vanevar Bush. Yes, the same article.

In other words Google lives in the intersection of two ideas whose history both trace back to the same essay. An essay written before most of us were alive. With that in mind it is interesting to read http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1945/07/as-we-ma... to see how it lead in both directions.

Re: Things I Didn't Know About Google (also: the worst VC decision ever)

#9

Post by staunch »

paul wrote: post #4

False history. The Applied Semantics software was not needed to "generate 99% of its revenues at IPO time". They owned the trademark "AdSense", but the actual software used by Google was written by Google. Also, the product known as AdSense (at that time) was just for content targetted ads, not the search ads which produce most of the profits, so his bit of trivia is actually double wrong.

Any idea if PageRank was named after Larry rather than Web Pages?

Re: Things I Didn't Know About Google (also: the worst VC decision ever)

#10

Post by nostrademons »

staunch wrote: post #9
paul wrote: post #4

False history. The Applied Semantics software was not needed to "generate 99% of its revenues at IPO time". They owned the trademark "AdSense", but the actual software used by Google was written by Google. Also, the product known as AdSense (at that time) was just for content targetted ads, not the search ads which produce most of the profits, so his bit of trivia is actually double wrong.

Any idea if PageRank was named after Larry rather than Web Pages?

Rumor has it that's true, unless Google itself is lying:

http://www.google.com/press/funfacts.html

Post reply on HN