Live data from Hacker News

Firefox 77

mozilla.org

91–100 of 167 posts

Re: Firefox 77

#91
post #63

Firefox 77 includes AV1 image format[0] support! You'll need to set image.avif.enabled = true in about:config. [0] https://aomediacodec.github.io/av1-avif/

Haven't been following this, is there any major site where this makes an impact? Youtube?

I doubt that any big site would be affected, since Firefox is the first browser shipping any form of AVIF support, even though most browsers already have AV1.

Re: Firefox 77

#92
Why remove config options and force some UI that clearly people are not happy with? I can not type in a url without showing the most visited sites? At least let me press ctrl-l or click in the url bar and start typing before showing me helpful information, trying to enter a new URL, I really do not want to see the most common sites again and again and again and again!

Is Firefox trying to kill the long tail of the internet and get everyone to just visit the top 5 sites?

Re: Firefox 77

#93
post #81
post #24

Everyone not happy with pocket recommendations, what is the alternate source of revenue? Not enough will pay for the product. On the other hand Mozilla has to compete with Apple, Google & Microsoft, all of whom are fighting hard for the Web. Mozilla is doing good overall. They are doing some fundamental work to get back the technical edge, still trying to keep the future of the platform open with WebAssembly and thei…

I would very happily pay a couple of bucks a month (I already do through their donations) to get the "ad-free" version of Firefox. Not sure if it can work for Firefox, but there are enough freemium apps on mobile which seem to make it work

But you can do it for free by going into about:config and setting extensions.pocket.enabled to false.

Re: Firefox 77

#94
post #82

And now my address bar expands on click, because browser.urlbar.update1 was removed from about:config. I knew this day was coming, but I'm still not happy it's here. The movement is distracting, and the alignment of the bar's expanded state is terrible. There's a reason most graphic design follows a grid system. We need a way to turn this off. I realize the old about:config flag was tied to a legacy code pathway, but…

It's really obtrusive. It takes up too much space, perhaps only by 2 pixels on each side or so, but it's too much, the contrast is too large, the outline is too heavy, and the a m o u n t o f w h i t e s p a c e is plain annoying. Why do they persist in these ugly design shenanigans?

[deleted]

Re: Firefox 77

#95
People keep recommending Brave, but I keep countering with Firefox. It's getting a lot harder to convince people when Firefox is doubling-down on BS like the expanding address bar, integrating articles/ads, telemetry, etc.

When I see Brave recommendations, they're primarily because of it's built-in ad-blocking. People value sanity. Don't introduce more visual distractions (essentially what the average person gets from an ad; they see it as a visual thing, they don't comprehend tracking and resource management like we do). Make Firefox clean, make it so that it can be easily recommended. When Chrome came out, people were excited because it was simple and sleek. It's okay to learn from competitors, don't let hubris be the downfall!

Re: Firefox 77

#96
post #35
post #25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The $500M per year they get from Google isn't enough to pay the bills?

Having other sources of revenue outside of a benefactor whose interesting in you relies on having a relevance in the browser market with them also actively engaged in implicitly or explicitly undermining that with a product of their own doesn't seem like too bad of an idea.

How does this relate to the original claim I was responding to which was "they have to pay their bills somehow"?

Re: Firefox 77

#97
post #92

Why remove config options and force some UI that clearly people are not happy with? I can not type in a url without showing the most visited sites? At least let me press ctrl-l or click in the url bar and start typing before showing me helpful information, trying to enter a new URL, I really do not want to see the most common sites again and again and again and again! Is Firefox trying to kill the long tail of the in…

UI teams universally think they know better than all the users they force their "improvements" onto.

Re: Firefox 77

#98
post #80
post #41

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What a pointless question; how can any of us know what your individual preferences are like? Mozilla aims to ship a default configuration that works well for a large number of users. Of course there'll be people -- like yourself, apparently -- who'd prefer some things to be configured differently, but what you'd like changed is entirely up to you. Maybe you should be grateful Firefox offers (quite a lot of) customisa…

> Maybe you should be grateful Firefox offers (quite a lot of) customisation opportunities, instead of just posting snarky remarks. That's called user feedback. Users are always right. And looking at Firefox's browser share they are not getting too many new users anymore. Making the life of your existing users a little more miserable does not sound like a very sustainable strategy.

> That's called user feedback

Not in any useful sense. "What do I need to turn off this time" presumably just implies "they should never change anything, the product is perfect already". (Which one was the perfect version, out of curiosity?)

Re: Firefox 77

#99

And now my address bar expands on click, because browser.urlbar.update1 was removed from about:config. I knew this day was coming, but I'm still not happy it's here. The movement is distracting, and the alignment of the bar's expanded state is terrible. There's a reason most graphic design follows a grid system. We need a way to turn this off. I realize the old about:config flag was tied to a legacy code pathway, but…

FWIW I quite like it. I'm not sure your dislike is universal, and tbh your comment feels a little https://xkcd.com/1172/ :-)
Post reply on HN