31–40 of 149 posts
if you are working with vscode, I highly recommand debugpy[1] or ptvsd[2] [1] https://github.com/microsoft/debugpy [2] https://github.com/microsoft/ptvsd
This is a bit of a weird article. It spends most of the time talking about logging, which is somewhat useful for debugging but not really. pdb gets a few lines of description, and that is about it. Personally, I can't live without Pycharm when working with Python purely because of how fantastic the debugging experience is. The integration with the interactive IPython shell is simply fantastic, and the live variable v…
from IPython import embed
embed()if you are working with vscode, I highly recommand debugpy[1] or ptvsd[2] [1] https://github.com/microsoft/debugpy [2] https://github.com/microsoft/ptvsd
Are they the one(s) that will be called if you use the "start debugging" in GUI with official Python extension? Or different one?
This is a bit of a weird article. It spends most of the time talking about logging, which is somewhat useful for debugging but not really. pdb gets a few lines of description, and that is about it. Personally, I can't live without Pycharm when working with Python purely because of how fantastic the debugging experience is. The integration with the interactive IPython shell is simply fantastic, and the live variable v…
import IPython; IPython.embed()This is a bit of a weird article. It spends most of the time talking about logging, which is somewhat useful for debugging but not really. pdb gets a few lines of description, and that is about it. Personally, I can't live without Pycharm when working with Python purely because of how fantastic the debugging experience is. The integration with the interactive IPython shell is simply fantastic, and the live variable v…
I tried pycharm once and every time i started it up it had to index files for hours. Anybody got around that problem? I really like IntelliJ so I would love to give pycharm a try.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I second PyCharm, not only from a debugging perspective but as a whole. I don't understand people struggling with generic text editors, development oriented text tools (sublime etc), or even vscode just because they are free when there is a much better tool money can buy (and PyCharm has a free, community version as well).
My main reason for wishing to be able to switch to Vscode instead of Pycharm is because vscode's remote development UX is really really nice and works a lot better for me compared to the Pycharm way of SFTP-ing files between your local and the remote. My use-case where Pycharm feels a bit deficient is that I have an Ubuntu deeplearning box at work that I can VNC into and develop on whenever needed. I have all my repo…
Current statement:
> We're very aware of how important this feature is, and we have several initiatives in place to provide a great experience for fully remote development. Unfortunately, at this time we're unable to share any specifics or timeframes, as getting the best possible experience requires massive-scale architectural changes to our codebase, but we've been working on this for quite some time already and we believe that we will have a solution that will go above and beyond what VS Code delivers today.
I've been a Python developer for more than ten years. Approximately 98% of the time I need to debug something I use print() statements and this: import IPython; IPython.embed()