Live data from Hacker News

Mark Zuckerberg faces employee blowback over ruling on Trump comments

reuters.com

111–120 of 410 posts

Re: Mark Zuckerberg faces employee blowback over ruling on Trump comments

#111
post #69

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sorry, I might have misunderstood, but did you just equate choosing to work at Facebook with being black?

I'm really reaching to understand how you could interpret my comment that way. I'm equating judging large swaths of people in the way the parent does as equivalent to society assuming black people "deserve" what they get.

Voluntarily working for Facebook and being judged for is not the same as being black.

Re: Mark Zuckerberg faces employee blowback over ruling on Trump comments

#112
Zuck has consistently backed right-wing politicians ever since he's had the chance. He had his Girl Friday solicit an antisemitic report on George Soros from a right-wing propaganda group -- that's something so stupid that everybody involved should have been fired right away and sent to Siberia. See

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eIqESwzCGg4

Although Zuck won't do anything about Trump posts that encourage violence, his company certainly will "fact check" ads that oppose Trump, even when those ads come from fellow Republicans.

Re: Mark Zuckerberg faces employee blowback over ruling on Trump comments

#113
post #40

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> but filter out anyone whose social media indicates them as being left-ish. Hiring based on political beliefs, or in this case, presumed political beliefs, sounds like a dangerous road to go down. And I am saying this as a young, STEM-educated person who skews left.

At least in EU, discriminating based on political beliefs goes against art. 21 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. Pardon my ignorance but, is that allowed in the US?

I believe that is allowed in some US states, because political affiliation is not a federally protected employment class, and some, but not all, states prohibit it.

Re: Mark Zuckerberg faces employee blowback over ruling on Trump comments

#114
Zuck get's it. Start censoring, editorializing etc. and section 230 protections will be gutted. On top of that anti-trust investigations intensify, rightfully, because you have not concentrated too much power into an un-regulated, un-elected platform vs the elected government which is against the interest of the country as a whole. For all of the engineers complaining about this, there are plenty of other ones who would be happy to take the place of the high paid engineers who have an issue with this and ask a lot less questions or who may even support what Zuck is doing.

Re: Mark Zuckerberg faces employee blowback over ruling on Trump comments

#115
post #49

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>Who the hell should be the truth police? You? People that have the same beliefs as you? Except Facebook is a private platform. That people use it does not make it a public platform. That would be like arguing that Six Flags over Georgia can't remove you from their park because you started protesting in it. Yes, there are people there, but no, just because they're there and it's a popular place doesn't mean they can'…

I rather like the comparison of social media platforms to amusement parks.

I usually compare them to pubs/night clubs:

They're places where people hang out and socialize or network.

Some have really strict bouncers whereas others will let just about anyone in as long as they're spending money and not shitting the place up too badly.

There are some that are so big and so popular that it almost doesn't matter if you prefer hanging out in another less popular one because no matter how you try, you'll never convince most of your friends to hang out at your favorite dive since everyone is at the big place.

...etc

Re: Mark Zuckerberg faces employee blowback over ruling on Trump comments

#117
post #7

People on twitter at other $bigtech seem more than happy to bring you all on board but you've been sucking that $270k+ top-end-even-for-FAANG salary with no concern for the ethics or morality of your business for years. This isn't new. I'm less than excited to see Facebook show up on a resume and haven't been for years. Not to mention the people I've interviewed from there seem to get so accustomed to working on Face…

Lol at Fbook's "attacks on democracy". You're the one that needs to prove your insane conspiracy theories bud. All Zuck said is that he doesn't think they should be the arbiter of truth, which is SMART, because otherwise they have to start censoring content for hundreds of millions of people, which they are bound to get wrong.

Watch some of Alex Stamos talks if you think this such an easy problem to solve.

Remind me again how Fbook takes away my right to vote?

Lotta people downvoting me because of the notion that "Facebook is bad" but won't explain why.

Re: Mark Zuckerberg faces employee blowback over ruling on Trump comments

#118

People really want Zuckerberg to decide whether posts of the president should be deleted or not? Is this for real? We really need mainstream decentralized applications more than ever. Thoughts of people should not be censored. Who the hell should be the truth police? You? People that have the same beliefs as you? This is just ridiculous. I don't like Facebook but great decision by Mark. Same as they decided to not re…

The thing the censorship fans can't seem to understand is the power they are granting.

Today the power is for their progressive friends, tomorrow it could be for regressive tyrants. Likely those are the very same people.

Just look to history. How many leftist uprising have worked out well?

Re: Mark Zuckerberg faces employee blowback over ruling on Trump comments

#119

People really want Zuckerberg to decide whether posts of the president should be deleted or not? Is this for real? We really need mainstream decentralized applications more than ever. Thoughts of people should not be censored. Who the hell should be the truth police? You? People that have the same beliefs as you? This is just ridiculous. I don't like Facebook but great decision by Mark. Same as they decided to not re…

>Who the hell should be the truth police? You? People that have the same beliefs as you? Except Facebook is a private platform. That people use it does not make it a public platform. That would be like arguing that Six Flags over Georgia can't remove you from their park because you started protesting in it. Yes, there are people there, but no, just because they're there and it's a popular place doesn't mean they can'…

> That would be like arguing that Six Flags over Georgia can't remove you from their park because you started protesting in it

But in the context of this post, you (and the Facebook employees) are actually arguing exactly the same thing: that Six Flags should be required to ban people who, for example, wear Republican candidate T-shirts to the park.

Re: Mark Zuckerberg faces employee blowback over ruling on Trump comments

#120
post #7

People on twitter at other $bigtech seem more than happy to bring you all on board but you've been sucking that $270k+ top-end-even-for-FAANG salary with no concern for the ethics or morality of your business for years. This isn't new. I'm less than excited to see Facebook show up on a resume and haven't been for years. Not to mention the people I've interviewed from there seem to get so accustomed to working on Face…

Care telling me where you make hiring decisions so I can avoid it like the self righteous plague it must be?
Post reply on HN