Live data from Hacker News

Subject: Airbnb

paulgraham.com

21–30 of 146 posts

Re: Subject: Airbnb

#24
post #12

It's interesting that in the end Airbnb raised from Sequoia, I wonder if lots of other VCs passed. It possibly shows why Sequoia are the best.

i THINK that by the time sequoia invested, airbnb was obviously on a roll. i could be wrong though.

Re: Subject: Airbnb

#27
post #14

If someone still has any doubts about the value of YC, they should read this email exchange. PG is pushing for the startup as if it was his own. He genuinely wanted them (and also the VC firm) to succeed. Great stuff.

What? He was invested in them. Do you think he wants to see them crash and burn?

You still really think he did all of that only because of YC's ~6% stake in them?

Re: Subject: Airbnb

#29

VCs often say they invest in team first and idea second but USV decided not to invest in AirBnb despite having no (obvious) reservations about the team or their ability to execute. Does this mean that ideas are more important than investors really let on?

Markets are the most important. Great team in a small market: no hope. Bad team anywhere: no hope. Great team in a great market, bad idea: there is hope (changing the idea is easy, just pour more money - changing the team is close to impossible)

Re: Subject: Airbnb

#30
Wow. I did not get the pun in AirBnB until I saw it spellers out widhelm he lowercase b in airbed.

The capital B is either a branding miss or an intentional branding effort to look more upscale than Airbed.

Post reply on HN