I'm glad that the space age has been rekindled. I wish Europe would do something similar.
SpaceX successfully launches two humans into orbit
121–130 of 839 posts
Re: SpaceX successfully launches two humans into orbit
#122Earlier quoted context omitted.
https://www.nasa.gov/specials/dm2/ > Lifting off from Launch Pad 39A atop a specially instrumented Falcon 9 rocket, Crew Dragon will accelerate its two passengers to approximately 17,000 mph and put it on an intercept course with the International Space Station. Once in orbit, the crew and SpaceX mission control will verify the spacecraft is performing as intended by testing the environmental control system, the disp…
Do they have to stay seated & buckled the whole 19 hours? Dare I ask how they eat or go to the bathroom on the 19 hour trip?
Re: SpaceX successfully launches two humans into orbit
#123And right as the booster was landing on the ship the satellite feed cut out.
That's quite normal. It happens on pretty much every launch to some extent. Something to do with vibrations causes by the landing burn and directional dishes
Re: SpaceX successfully launches two humans into orbit
#124Re: SpaceX successfully launches two humans into orbit
#125Re: SpaceX successfully launches two humans into orbit
#126Earlier quoted context omitted.
https://www.nasa.gov/specials/dm2/ > Lifting off from Launch Pad 39A atop a specially instrumented Falcon 9 rocket, Crew Dragon will accelerate its two passengers to approximately 17,000 mph and put it on an intercept course with the International Space Station. Once in orbit, the crew and SpaceX mission control will verify the spacecraft is performing as intended by testing the environmental control system, the disp…
Do they have to stay seated & buckled the whole 19 hours? Dare I ask how they eat or go to the bathroom on the 19 hour trip?
Re: SpaceX successfully launches two humans into orbit
#127Earlier quoted context omitted.
Non-toxic would be better than toxic. What would be the options? Compressed cold-gas (which don't have much kick, and require compressed gas which carry their own dangers). You could go with a monoprop Hydrazine which would eliminate half the toxic stuff. There are also some new developments here: hydroxylammonium nitrate (HAN)/water/fuel ? No idea of the trade offs there. Biprop hydrocarbon/gaseous compressed oxygen…
> What would be the options? Soyuz uses straight hydrogen peroxide, I believe, 82% concentration. For 3 tons capsule it takes 30 kg of peroxide - monopropellant - to land. Buran is still the example of a high tech option - it used LOX and kerosene for RCS, the biggest trick was to keep LOX liquid for a month-long missions. It was done with mid-1980 technologies. Kliper planned to use LOX and ethanol. The craft wasn't…
Re: SpaceX successfully launches two humans into orbit
#128It is hard to convey how "sustainable" this feels to me. For the first time, humans have gone into orbit in a spacecraft that was designed from the ground up to be a commercial venture. All of the NASA missions prior to this have an ambience of "uneconomical but useful". Even the shuttle, which was supposed to be this cost effective space truck, turned out to be not even close. And the last thing I'm feeling is the a…
"Thank you for flying with Falcon 9 today", as though it's an airplane.
Re: SpaceX successfully launches two humans into orbit
#129Does anyone know if there's an interactive map where we can track where Dragon is in context of the earth?
Re: SpaceX successfully launches two humans into orbit
#130I'm glad that the space age has been rekindled. I wish Europe would do something similar.
Thinking of Europe, I have a feeling that it's just surreal that this launch is happening in America at the same time with the events in Minneapolis