That's assuming he ever mattered in the first place, as good an example as any of begging the question.
He didn’t. He was a fad of high school English teachers in 2000-2005, so now a handful of 30-somethings think he was some kind of important figure. Silly.
Why T.S. Eliot still matters
11–20 of 60 posts
Re: Why T.S. Eliot still matters
#12Re: Why T.S. Eliot still matters
#13In the public forum, Eliot’s stature does seem to be high. Yet I wonder how many people celebrating him are under the age of thirty. Readers over thirty are likely to have discovered him in decades past when, firstly, there was more of a culture of actual print books (Eliot’s long and intricate verse works best on the physical page), and secondly, much of the canon (and the whole idea of a canon) had not yet been so…
> for readers who believe that favoring female and minority voices is a moral and ethical issue A strange morality indeed that mandates sexism and racism...
Re: Why T.S. Eliot still matters
#14Earlier quoted context omitted.
He didn’t. He was a fad of high school English teachers in 2000-2005, so now a handful of 30-somethings think he was some kind of important figure. Silly.
Please stop posting unsubstantive comments to HN. You've done it a lot, unfortunately, and it's not what this site is for. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
Re: Why T.S. Eliot still matters
#15In the public forum, Eliot’s stature does seem to be high. Yet I wonder how many people celebrating him are under the age of thirty. Readers over thirty are likely to have discovered him in decades past when, firstly, there was more of a culture of actual print books (Eliot’s long and intricate verse works best on the physical page), and secondly, much of the canon (and the whole idea of a canon) had not yet been so…
Re: Why T.S. Eliot still matters
#16Earlier quoted context omitted.
Please stop posting unsubstantive comments to HN. You've done it a lot, unfortunately, and it's not what this site is for. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
How is it unsubstantive?
Re: Why T.S. Eliot still matters
#17Re: Why T.S. Eliot still matters
#18In the public forum, Eliot’s stature does seem to be high. Yet I wonder how many people celebrating him are under the age of thirty. Readers over thirty are likely to have discovered him in decades past when, firstly, there was more of a culture of actual print books (Eliot’s long and intricate verse works best on the physical page), and secondly, much of the canon (and the whole idea of a canon) had not yet been so…
I discovered Eliot in my 20s. I’m still discovering him: I’ve been working my way through Four Quartets for about five years. Spent about 10 years discovering The Waste Land. Yes he’s a privileged white male. But even for younger readers, that’s not a huge turn off. Besides, he may have been gay. Regarding his public stature - he’s still present - more so than, say, Ezra Pound. For example, “Better You Believe” ( htt…
Re: Why T.S. Eliot still matters
#19Re: Why T.S. Eliot still matters
#20In the public forum, Eliot’s stature does seem to be high. Yet I wonder how many people celebrating him are under the age of thirty. Readers over thirty are likely to have discovered him in decades past when, firstly, there was more of a culture of actual print books (Eliot’s long and intricate verse works best on the physical page), and secondly, much of the canon (and the whole idea of a canon) had not yet been so…