Live data from Hacker News

Letters of a Radio-Engineer to His Son (1922)

gutenberg.org

1–10 of 14 posts

Re: Letters of a Radio-Engineer to His Son (1922)

#2
It’s always kind of wonderful to read older texts. For one, the style is often much more approachably clear; for another, sometimes you find hidden gems of history.

One of my favorite bits of science history is the first edition of a text on metallurgy, that was meant for sales reps for a carnegie steel affiliate company.

The purpose of the book was to give sales reps enough clue to not embarrass themselves; it’s evolved and the book, now in its 8th edition or something, is a standard reference text for undergraduates.

Anyway the first chapter or so of the 1914 text was explaining the basic chemistry of the universe and went something like:

The three things that make up our physical universe are: matter, which is stuff that has mass; energy, which is the capacity to do work; and the luminiferous aether, which is the medium through which light propagates...

Re: Letters of a Radio-Engineer to His Son (1922)

#3

It’s always kind of wonderful to read older texts. For one, the style is often much more approachably clear; for another, sometimes you find hidden gems of history. One of my favorite bits of science history is the first edition of a text on metallurgy, that was meant for sales reps for a carnegie steel affiliate company. The purpose of the book was to give sales reps enough clue to not embarrass themselves; it’s evo…

I think you mean luminiferous aether, unless there’s a pun in there I’m not getting.

Re: Letters of a Radio-Engineer to His Son (1922)

#4

It’s always kind of wonderful to read older texts. For one, the style is often much more approachably clear; for another, sometimes you find hidden gems of history. One of my favorite bits of science history is the first edition of a text on metallurgy, that was meant for sales reps for a carnegie steel affiliate company. The purpose of the book was to give sales reps enough clue to not embarrass themselves; it’s evo…

I’ve been reading a lot of H.G. Wells’ nonfiction. As a child in a one-room English schoolhouse, he was still being taught the four “elements” of earth, water, fire, and air. Aristotle would be proud!

Re: Letters of a Radio-Engineer to His Son (1922)

#5

It’s always kind of wonderful to read older texts. For one, the style is often much more approachably clear; for another, sometimes you find hidden gems of history. One of my favorite bits of science history is the first edition of a text on metallurgy, that was meant for sales reps for a carnegie steel affiliate company. The purpose of the book was to give sales reps enough clue to not embarrass themselves; it’s evo…

And in a lot of cases, they don’t assume you already know xxx because it was new then.

Re: Letters of a Radio-Engineer to His Son (1922)

#7
post #4

It’s always kind of wonderful to read older texts. For one, the style is often much more approachably clear; for another, sometimes you find hidden gems of history. One of my favorite bits of science history is the first edition of a text on metallurgy, that was meant for sales reps for a carnegie steel affiliate company. The purpose of the book was to give sales reps enough clue to not embarrass themselves; it’s evo…

I’ve been reading a lot of H.G. Wells’ nonfiction. As a child in a one-room English schoolhouse, he was still being taught the four “elements” of earth, water, fire, and air. Aristotle would be proud!

but everything changed when the martians attacked.

Re: Letters of a Radio-Engineer to His Son (1922)

#9
post #3

It’s always kind of wonderful to read older texts. For one, the style is often much more approachably clear; for another, sometimes you find hidden gems of history. One of my favorite bits of science history is the first edition of a text on metallurgy, that was meant for sales reps for a carnegie steel affiliate company. The purpose of the book was to give sales reps enough clue to not embarrass themselves; it’s evo…

I think you mean luminiferous aether , unless there’s a pun in there I’m not getting.

Ether is a perfectly valid spelling in British English. See meaning 3 at https://www.lexico.com/definition/ether.

Re: Letters of a Radio-Engineer to His Son (1922)

#10
post #3

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think you mean luminiferous aether , unless there’s a pun in there I’m not getting.

Ether is a perfectly valid spelling in British English. See meaning 3 at https://www.lexico.com/definition/ether .

Its valid in American English too, frankly and see it used frequently.

Out of the ether, Ethernet and so on.

Post reply on HN