Htmx – high power tools for HTML
21–30 of 175 posts
Re: Htmx – high power tools for HTML
#22This is pretty cool. Does it only send data? If yes, I don't really see a clear use-case for it, as you normally either want zero JS and just use plain HTML forms posting or you have a dynamic interface and you use a lot of JS to update data on the page.
Re: Htmx – high power tools for HTML
#23Very cool. This seems very useful for lightweight UIs that need a small amount of interactivity, but not enough that a more heavyweight framework like React would make sense. Am I on the right track?
the progress bar demo shows how you can implement a UI that would typically be done w/ javascript using pure HTML responses:
Re: Htmx – high power tools for HTML
#24hello, I'm the creator of htmx (and originally intercooler) I just released 0.0.4, so htmx is still very young, but it's got a decent test suite: https://htmx.org/test/0.0.4/test/ there is a nice extension mechanism: https://htmx.org/extensions/ and some very rough docs on how to pull off pure HTML animations: https://htmx.org/examples/animations/ happy to answer questions
A question about this example: https://htmx.org/examples/inline-validation/
This paradigm revolves around sending validation requests to server-side endpoints, is there any reason to put that load on the server rather than validate it on the page prior to submit with JS? Or scalability issues?
Not being antagonistic, genuinely curious because I've not seen inline validation done this way.
Re: Htmx – high power tools for HTML
#25hello, I'm the creator of htmx (and originally intercooler) I just released 0.0.4, so htmx is still very young, but it's got a decent test suite: https://htmx.org/test/0.0.4/test/ there is a nice extension mechanism: https://htmx.org/extensions/ and some very rough docs on how to pull off pure HTML animations: https://htmx.org/examples/animations/ happy to answer questions
Re: Htmx – high power tools for HTML
#26This is pretty cool. Does it only send data? If yes, I don't really see a clear use-case for it, as you normally either want zero JS and just use plain HTML forms posting or you have a dynamic interface and you use a lot of JS to update data on the page.
What else would you send?
Re: Htmx – high power tools for HTML
#27Re: Htmx – high power tools for HTML
#28Re: Htmx – high power tools for HTML
#29This is pretty cool. Does it only send data? If yes, I don't really see a clear use-case for it, as you normally either want zero JS and just use plain HTML forms posting or you have a dynamic interface and you use a lot of JS to update data on the page.
What else would you send?
Re: Htmx – high power tools for HTML
#30Earlier quoted context omitted.
I like unpoly a lot, Henning is a perfect gentleman, but the first check in on intercooler.js was before the first check in on unpoly: https://github.com/bigskysoftware/intercooler-js/graphs/cont... https://github.com/unpoly/unpoly/graphs/contributors I'm happy to change the headers htmx is young enough to get away with it. Would you like to issue a pull request?
Fair point – though some might say if you start over in a new repo then you have reset the clock ;). In all honestly though, wasn't trying to imply that this project ripped off Unpoly or anything, just wanted to mention a similar project. Perhaps poor phrasing on my part. As to a PR for the headers – I might just take you up on that!
It's clear that this is not what you intended, but I think from the response from the creator, that was the tone that you accidentally conveyed.
Just a thought for the future :-).