Live data from Hacker News

Google no longer providing original URL in AMP for image search results

twitter.com

121–130 of 566 posts

Re: Google no longer providing original URL in AMP for image search results

#121

AMP results are annoying enough on mobile that I switched my default search engine to duckduckgo on my phone.

Idk I really appreciate the lack of cookie popups and subscribe to this and that popups that can occupy almost the entire screen bedoree being dismissed on mobile.

Re: Google no longer providing original URL in AMP for image search results

#123

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What about the URL bar? For average non techie users, the URL bar isn't particularly helpful. They use page content. And AMP pages do show the original page domain name.

The URL bar is helpful to fighting phishing attacks. It's one of the things everyone at my company, including the non-technical people, is askedt to check before entering information. Also techie and non-techie people have been using the same browsers for how many decades now? Aren't the majority of people in many countries on the internet? It seems like the average non-techie users succeeded in figuring things out s…

> The URL bar is helpful to fighting phishing attacks

It would have been nice if client side TLS certificates were more popular. Then your browser could warn you that you're not using your client cert when connecting to a certain website and not allow you to complete the connection. That would be a better solution as opposed to relying on users to manually check the URL.

Re: Google no longer providing original URL in AMP for image search results

#124
post #104
post #93

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah, but then you have another vendor lock in, not to mention that apple products are expensive for me, I don't have an US salary.

I just had a discussion with someone on Lobsters about the actual cost of a lower-end iPhone versus a similarly-priced Android phone and the iPhone appeared cheaper: > The Pixel 4 is $799 and the Pixel 3a is $399 (although it may be on sale right now depending on your region). The iPhone 11 is $699 and the iPhone SE (2nd generation) is $399. Both provide additional discounts if you trade in your current phone (and si…

Maybe, but I don't spend money on high end phones, I don't really see the point if you are not going to play games. I have an LG G4 and honestly, don't really need more.

Re: Google no longer providing original URL in AMP for image search results

#125

  Some website: "I did this"
  *walks away as Google approaches*
  Google: ... "I did this"
Seriously, though. I understand why the general public isn't pushing back against this, but why don't I see more push back from websites? Websites support AMP for SEO, but at this point they should be trying to redirect users away from AMP and social media sites should be trying to automatically strip AMP from links.

And why does the "Redirect AMP to HTML" extension on Firefox have so few users?

Re: Google no longer providing original URL in AMP for image search results

#127
I got a new computer (Mac Mini) last week and, as the ritual usually goes, I opened Safari and was about to type “google.com/chrome”, then stopped myself and went to “getfirefox.com” instead. It’s been a while since I gave FF a serious look, and so far I haven’t felt like I’m missing anything.

Next up, I need to change my default search engine to DDG.

What’s a good privacy-oriented, web-based email service? I’ve heard of ProtonMail but haven’t used it.

Re: Google no longer providing original URL in AMP for image search results

#128
post #26

AMP really has to go away, its a MITM attack on the internet. Google discontinues so many services, why is AMP not one of them yet?

AMP is MITM attack on the internet.

best and most succinct description that I've heard.

Re: Google no longer providing original URL in AMP for image search results

#129

How does anyone think this is a good idea? It should be clear which news site I am reading when I'm reading an article. Otherwise, how do I know which bias to apply? On iOS, the title bar says "google.com" whether I'm reading an article from CNN.com or WashingtonExaminer.com. Of all the anti-competitive actions google has taken around search results, AMP is by far the worst. I hope they get smacked down for it in the…

So how long until AMP is exploited in a wide range phishing campaign? I know that it is getting harder and harder to distinguish phishing emails from non-phishing emails, but this move is not helping at all. It clearly helps google though.

The annoying thing is, average user will not notice and/or care.

Post reply on HN