AMP results are annoying enough on mobile that I switched my default search engine to duckduckgo on my phone.
Google no longer providing original URL in AMP for image search results
121–130 of 566 posts
Re: Google no longer providing original URL in AMP for image search results
#122Re: Google no longer providing original URL in AMP for image search results
#123Earlier quoted context omitted.
What about the URL bar? For average non techie users, the URL bar isn't particularly helpful. They use page content. And AMP pages do show the original page domain name.
The URL bar is helpful to fighting phishing attacks. It's one of the things everyone at my company, including the non-technical people, is askedt to check before entering information. Also techie and non-techie people have been using the same browsers for how many decades now? Aren't the majority of people in many countries on the internet? It seems like the average non-techie users succeeded in figuring things out s…
It would have been nice if client side TLS certificates were more popular. Then your browser could warn you that you're not using your client cert when connecting to a certain website and not allow you to complete the connection. That would be a better solution as opposed to relying on users to manually check the URL.
Re: Google no longer providing original URL in AMP for image search results
#124Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yeah, but then you have another vendor lock in, not to mention that apple products are expensive for me, I don't have an US salary.
I just had a discussion with someone on Lobsters about the actual cost of a lower-end iPhone versus a similarly-priced Android phone and the iPhone appeared cheaper: > The Pixel 4 is $799 and the Pixel 3a is $399 (although it may be on sale right now depending on your region). The iPhone 11 is $699 and the iPhone SE (2nd generation) is $399. Both provide additional discounts if you trade in your current phone (and si…
Re: Google no longer providing original URL in AMP for image search results
#125 Some website: "I did this"
*walks away as Google approaches*
Google: ... "I did this"
Seriously, though. I understand why the general public isn't pushing back against this, but why don't I see more push back from websites? Websites support AMP for SEO, but at this point they should be trying to redirect users away from AMP and social media sites should be trying to automatically strip AMP from links.And why does the "Redirect AMP to HTML" extension on Firefox have so few users?
Re: Google no longer providing original URL in AMP for image search results
#126Re: Google no longer providing original URL in AMP for image search results
#127Next up, I need to change my default search engine to DDG.
What’s a good privacy-oriented, web-based email service? I’ve heard of ProtonMail but haven’t used it.
Re: Google no longer providing original URL in AMP for image search results
#128AMP really has to go away, its a MITM attack on the internet. Google discontinues so many services, why is AMP not one of them yet?
best and most succinct description that I've heard.
Re: Google no longer providing original URL in AMP for image search results
#129How does anyone think this is a good idea? It should be clear which news site I am reading when I'm reading an article. Otherwise, how do I know which bias to apply? On iOS, the title bar says "google.com" whether I'm reading an article from CNN.com or WashingtonExaminer.com. Of all the anti-competitive actions google has taken around search results, AMP is by far the worst. I hope they get smacked down for it in the…
The annoying thing is, average user will not notice and/or care.
Re: Google no longer providing original URL in AMP for image search results
#130I searched 'google amp', and I can't really understand what it's supposed to do?
Can anyone explain what problem AMP is supposed solve, or what features it brings to the table?