Live data from Hacker News

A lot of “idiotic” things have reasonable explanations (2011)

theatlantic.com

41–50 of 438 posts

Re: A lot of “idiotic” things have reasonable explanations (2011)

#41

Whenever you see someone who you believe to be an idiot succeeding, it usually means they're really good at the game and you don't even understand what the game is .

Or maybe you do, but simply refuse to play the game due to ethical and moral grounds.

Re: A lot of “idiotic” things have reasonable explanations (2011)

#42
post #27

Whenever you see someone who you believe to be an idiot succeeding, it usually means they're really good at the game and you don't even understand what the game is .

Or maybe you just don't want to play the game anymore.

I think this is sadly very true - trying to actually be a kind person really limits how well you can play "the game".

There's no good solution to this either - if there was more kindness in the world, then that would just create even more opportunities for the people playing the game to get ahead, because they would have more victims to exploit.

Re: A lot of “idiotic” things have reasonable explanations (2011)

#43

Whenever you see someone who you believe to be an idiot succeeding, it usually means they're really good at the game and you don't even understand what the game is .

Or their family donated enough money to an Ivy to have a building named after them.

He said success, not wealth. Yes, obviously someone inheriting their parents' billion dollar business is wealthy, but I wouldn't consider them successful unless they've done something on their own.

Re: A lot of “idiotic” things have reasonable explanations (2011)

#44

To answer the question posed in the title (and yes, I read the fluffy article) - luck decides who gets rich.

Luck plays a role but smart and successful people often create many opportunities to get lucky.

"Trust your luck, Taran Wanderer. But don't forget to put out your nets!" ― Llonio (Lloyd Alexander)

Re: A lot of “idiotic” things have reasonable explanations (2011)

#45
2011 is the context: a height of the start-up wave, ascendance of FB--presumably due to "genius". The implication being that if you are really smarter than others you must have the rewards to show it. Hopefully this would be received today as a tone-deaf denial of privilege. The great myth of meritocracy has been blown apart.

Re: A lot of “idiotic” things have reasonable explanations (2011)

#47

Whenever you see someone who you believe to be an idiot succeeding, it usually means they're really good at the game and you don't even understand what the game is .

And sometimes that game is rack up lots of debt. I’m only in my mid-30s but I’ve already seen multiple occasions of people being swindled by someone they thought was a multimillionaire in lending them $10,000. If you can’t understand where someone’s wealth cane from, there’s a chance it doesn’t exist.

Re: A lot of “idiotic” things have reasonable explanations (2011)

#48

To answer the question posed in the title (and yes, I read the fluffy article) - luck decides who gets rich.

I think that’s needlessly reductionist. Read the biographies of people like Mark Cuban and Richard Branson: both of these men were born entrepreneurs and salesmen, with Cuban starting his first business at age 12 and Branson at age 16. A good parallel to this is the music industry, actually: yes, there is a significant amount of luck in “making it.” But you cannot deny that talent is one of the strongest predictors:…

I think people like Cuban and Branson are good examples of those who "make their own luck", where they're running the business version of Monte Carlo simulation until something sticks. They definitely have the right mindset and skillset to do things like run a business successfully, but obviously the probability of success increases with the number of attempts.
Post reply on HN