Who is buying ads on these networks? There cannot possibly be any returns can there?
To show how easy it is for plagiarized news sites to get ad revenue, I made one
11–20 of 40 posts
Re: To show how easy it is for plagiarized news sites to get ad revenue, I made one
#12Not much proven so far.
Many site seem to translate to language X and back to English to clean the data.
Research this.
Anyone using GANs yet?
How do you stop sites blocking your scraper?
There's money for the ad companies to allow you to plod along then steal your hard earned money because you are breaking the rules. Are they?
Re: To show how easy it is for plagiarized news sites to get ad revenue, I made one
#13> These firms mostly sold “popunder” ads, which pop up a new link in a browser tab when you click something Who is buying ads on these networks? There cannot possibly be any returns can there?
Re: To show how easy it is for plagiarized news sites to get ad revenue, I made one
#14We're working on another way for disseminating news. It might make plagiarism a little more difficult, while also working a little better for our audience: https://blog.nillium.com/what-can-napster-teach-local-news/
How does that help prevent plagiarism?
Re: To show how easy it is for plagiarized news sites to get ad revenue, I made one
#15We're working on another way for disseminating news. It might make plagiarism a little more difficult, while also working a little better for our audience: https://blog.nillium.com/what-can-napster-teach-local-news/
How does that help prevent plagiarism?
Re: To show how easy it is for plagiarized news sites to get ad revenue, I made one
#16> These firms mostly sold “popunder” ads, which pop up a new link in a browser tab when you click something Who is buying ads on these networks? There cannot possibly be any returns can there?
Re: To show how easy it is for plagiarized news sites to get ad revenue, I made one
#17I suspect one of the hard parts of this for Google is that many news sites legitimately publish the same articles because of wire services and correspondence arrangements, like AP and Reuters. Hard to tell whether the new site is plagiarizing or syndicating.
Re: To show how easy it is for plagiarized news sites to get ad revenue, I made one
#18Earlier quoted context omitted.
It may be a low bar, but being able to automate this (scraping website ansible playbook?), makes the effort required as near-nil. They only have to clear $50 to pay for ALOT of domains and hosting.
Sure but you need thousands of legitimate-seeming pageviews to get that $50 back, and the networks - even or especially the bottom tier ones - are likely to be hotter on click fraud than scraped content.
its really not easy to get the ad revenue, scraped websites can't rank good and get enough visitors, of course one can make fraud clicks system, but if one can do this level, he may easily find more interesting things, but not peanut $$
Re: To show how easy it is for plagiarized news sites to get ad revenue, I made one
#19Doesn't say how much she made from it. Guess: very close to zero, if not zero.
Including hosting? I'm sure it's actually in red.
Re: To show how easy it is for plagiarized news sites to get ad revenue, I made one
#20Scrape existing news sites, and use machine learning to paraphrase everything so Google doesn't detect plagiarism.